PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEBX vs. ADBG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEBX vs. ADBG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEBX achieves a 496.81% return, which is significantly higher than ADBG's -52.15% return.


NEBX

1D
7.10%
1M
97.88%
YTD
496.81%
6M
272.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ADBG

1D
1.66%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
-52.15%
6M
-46.56%
1Y
-69.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEBX vs. ADBG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NEBX
Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
496.81%-43.34%
ADBG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF
-52.15%-8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between NEBX and ADBG is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEBX vs. ADBG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEBX

ADBG
ADBG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ADBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADBG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
ADBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADBG Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEBX vs. ADBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NEBX vs. ADBG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEBXADBGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.22

-0.90

+3.12

Drawdowns

NEBX vs. ADBG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEBX drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, roughly equal to the maximum ADBG drawdown of -76.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEBX and ADBG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEBXADBGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.97%

-76.71%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-70.94%

+67.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.72%

-41.74%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.32%

Volatility

NEBX vs. ADBG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEBXADBGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

192.59%

67.12%

+125.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

192.59%

66.85%

+125.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

192.59%

66.85%

+125.74%

NEBX vs. ADBG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ADBG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEBX vs. ADBG - Dividend Comparison

Neither NEBX nor ADBG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NEBX and ADBG have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ADBG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ADBG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for NEBX.

NEBX and ADBG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for NEBX and 0.75% for ADBG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEBX and ADBG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer