NEBX vs. AAOX
NEBX (Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and AAOX (Tradr 2X Long AAOI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. NEBX is actively managed, while AAOX is passively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for AAOX.
Performance
NEBX vs. AAOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NEBX
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -20.39%
- 6M
- 172.18%
- YTD
- 268.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAOX
- 1D
- -3.89%
- 1M
- -56.19%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEBX vs. AAOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NEBX Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 157.87% |
AAOX Tradr 2X Long AAOI Daily ETF | -22.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEBX and AAOX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2026 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEBX vs. AAOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX) and Tradr 2X Long AAOI Daily ETF (AAOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEBX vs. AAOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEBX drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, roughly equal to the maximum AAOX drawdown of -80.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEBX and AAOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEBX | AAOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.97% | -80.97% | +3.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.47% | -79.27% | +32.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.93% | -34.28% | -4.65% |
Volatility
NEBX vs. AAOX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEBX | AAOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 195.59% | 290.17% | -94.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 195.59% | 290.17% | -94.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 195.59% | 290.17% | -94.58% |
NEBX vs. AAOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AAOX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEBX vs. AAOX - Dividend Comparison
Neither NEBX nor AAOX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NEBX and AAOX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NEBX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEBX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for AAOX.
NEBX and AAOX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for NEBX and 1.49% for AAOX.
Find the right allocation for NEBX and AAOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer