PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEAR vs. BBBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEAR vs. BBBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) and BBH Limited Duration Fund (BBBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEAR achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than BBBIX's 1.45% return. Over the past 10 years, NEAR has underperformed BBBIX with an annualized return of 2.85%, while BBBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.46% annualized return.


NEAR

1D
0.02%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.75%
6M
1.25%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
5.63%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
2.85%

BBBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.45%
6M
1.87%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
6.31%
5Y*
4.00%
10Y*
3.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEAR vs. BBBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
0.75%5.90%5.09%7.42%0.41%0.32%1.39%3.55%1.71%1.41%
BBBIX
BBH Limited Duration Fund
1.45%5.62%6.79%7.63%-1.42%1.06%2.85%4.39%2.07%2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between NEAR and BBBIX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2013

0.30

Over the past year, NEAR and BBBIX have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEAR vs. BBBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEAR
NEAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NEAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

BBBIX
BBBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BBBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEAR vs. BBBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) and BBH Limited Duration Fund (BBBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEARBBBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

2.37

-0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

8.41

-4.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.84

35.12

-18.28

NEAR vs. BBBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.08, which is comparable to the BBBIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEAR and BBBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEARBBBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08

3.07

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.90

2.60

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

2.35

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

1.48

-0.39

Drawdowns

NEAR vs. BBBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEAR drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, which is greater than BBBIX's maximum drawdown of -6.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAR and BBBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEARBBBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-6.60%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.13%

-0.57%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.16%

-0.57%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.32%

-3.16%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.61%

-6.60%

-3.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-0.46%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

0.14%

+0.11%

Volatility

NEAR vs. BBBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) is 0.37%, while BBH Limited Duration Fund (BBBIX) has a volatility of 0.43%. This indicates that NEAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEARBBBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

0.43%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.99%

1.03%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36%

1.56%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.34%

1.55%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.50%

1.47%

+1.03%

NEAR vs. BBBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEAR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BBBIX's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NEAR vs. BBBIX - Dividend Comparison

NEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than BBBIX's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBBIX
BBH Limited Duration Fund
4.60%4.68%4.88%4.31%1.84%1.35%2.09%3.01%2.66%2.09%2.23%2.08%
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
4.43%4.54%5.00%4.59%1.78%0.76%1.53%2.69%2.25%1.52%1.07%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEAR and BBBIX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBBIX has higher volatility (0.43%) compared to NEAR (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAR dropped -9.61% vs BBBIX's -6.60%.

NEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 3.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEAR and BBBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer