NE vs. PSLV
NE (Noble Corporation) is a stock, while PSLV (Sprott Physical Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the No Index (Physical Silver). Over the past 3 years, NE returned 9.82%/yr vs 41.73%/yr for PSLV. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NE vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NE achieves a 67.02% return, which is significantly higher than PSLV's -1.78% return.
NE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- 67.02%
- 6M
- 42.41%
- 1Y
- 84.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSLV
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- 100.09%
- 3Y*
- 41.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.97%
NE vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NE Noble Corporation | 67.02% | -3.21% | -31.57% | 29.54% | 52.00% | 0.24% |
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | -1.78% | 145.08% | 19.43% | -1.94% | 2.74% | -19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between NE and PSLV is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
NE:
$7.51B
PSLV:
$14.73B
NE:
$1.43
PSLV:
$13.57
NE:
32.65
PSLV:
1.71
NE:
8.88
PSLV:
0.00
NE:
2.34
PSLV:
218.98
NE:
1.64
PSLV:
0.90
NE:
$3.20B
PSLV:
$64.19M
NE:
$716.15M
PSLV:
$404.67M
NE:
$1.11B
PSLV:
$8.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NE vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank
NE
PSLV
NE vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Noble Corporation (NE) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NE | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.14 | 2.48 | +2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 5.50 | +5.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NE | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 1.72 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.17 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
NE vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NE drawdown since its inception was -63.16%, smaller than the maximum PSLV drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NE and PSLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NE | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.16% | -79.38% | +16.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.56% | -40.65% | +24.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.16% | -40.65% | -22.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.20% | -36.11% | +21.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.54% | -58.15% | +38.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.47% | 18.25% | -10.78% |
Volatility
NE vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Noble Corporation (NE) is 9.89%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 16.57%. This indicates that NE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NE | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.89% | 16.57% | -6.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.66% | 57.35% | -27.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.87% | 58.49% | -17.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.43% | 35.64% | +7.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.43% | 31.14% | +12.29% |
Dividends
NE vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison
NE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, while PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NE Noble Corporation | 4.29% | 7.08% | 5.73% | 1.45% |
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NE and PSLV have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSLV has higher volatility (16.57%) compared to NE (9.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NE dropped -63.16% vs PSLV's -79.38%.
NE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NE and PSLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer