PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDVG vs. NUMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDVG vs. NUMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF (NDVG) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NDVG

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUMG

1D
-1.63%
1M
5.76%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
0.31%
1Y
-0.49%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDVG vs. NUMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NDVG
Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF
-1.62%10.06%17.60%15.15%-9.55%11.07%
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-0.40%0.78%11.99%20.47%-28.31%-1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NDVG and NUMG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2021

0.77

The correlation between NDVG and NUMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NDVG vs. NUMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NDVG
NUMG

Technology

28.9%
28.7%

Financial Services

14.7%
6.5%

Industrials

10.2%
26.5%

Healthcare

9.8%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Energy

5.3%

-

Utilities

5.1%
1.4%

Real Estate

3.9%
3.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
5.2%

Basic Materials

2.2%
2.3%

Technology

NDVG
28.9%
NUMG
28.7%

Financial Services

NDVG
14.7%
NUMG
6.5%

Industrials

NDVG
10.2%
NUMG
26.5%

Healthcare

NDVG
9.8%
NUMG
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

NDVG
9.7%
NUMG
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

NDVG
7.7%
NUMG

-

Energy

NDVG
5.3%
NUMG

-

Utilities

NDVG
5.1%
NUMG
1.4%

Real Estate

NDVG
3.9%
NUMG
3.7%

Communication Services

NDVG
2.7%
NUMG
5.2%

Basic Materials

NDVG
2.2%
NUMG
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDVG vs. NUMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDVG

NUMG
NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDVG vs. NUMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF (NDVG) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NDVG vs. NUMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NDVGNUMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

Drawdowns

NDVG vs. NUMG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDVGNUMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

Volatility

NDVG vs. NUMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDVGNUMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

NDVG vs. NUMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDVG has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than NUMG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDVG vs. NUMG - Dividend Comparison

NDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than NUMG's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDVG
Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF
4.41%1.05%1.20%1.24%1.34%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.01%0.01%0.06%0.18%0.18%12.76%3.82%0.27%5.14%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


NDVG and NUMG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NUMG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NUMG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for NDVG.

NDVG has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.

NDVG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NUMG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for NDVG and 0.30% for NUMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDVG and NUMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer