PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDSN vs. MDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NDSN vs. MDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nordson Corporation (NDSN) and Medtronic plc (MDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDSN achieves a 20.24% return, which is significantly higher than MDT's -15.83% return. Over the past 10 years, NDSN has outperformed MDT with an annualized return of 14.17%, while MDT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.00% annualized return.


NDSN

1D
0.90%
1M
3.33%
YTD
20.24%
6M
23.21%
1Y
34.03%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
14.17%

MDT

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.24%
YTD
-15.83%
6M
-18.44%
1Y
-6.49%
3Y*
1.02%
5Y*
-5.47%
10Y*
2.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDSN vs. MDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDSN
Nordson Corporation
20.24%17.03%-20.15%12.39%-5.93%28.09%24.45%37.88%-17.65%31.83%
MDT
Medtronic plc
-15.83%24.05%0.28%9.58%-22.55%-9.79%5.70%27.34%15.18%15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between NDSN and MDT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.28

The correlation between NDSN and MDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NDSN:

$16.17B

MDT:

$103.31B

EPS

NDSN:

$9.36

MDT:

$3.58

PE Ratio

NDSN:

30.79

MDT:

22.38

PEG Ratio

NDSN:

12.07

MDT:

2.02

PS Ratio

NDSN:

5.60

MDT:

2.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

NDSN:

$2.90B

MDT:

$35.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NDSN:

$1.60B

MDT:

$5.78B

EBITDA (TTM)

NDSN:

$744.50M

MDT:

$7.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDSN vs. MDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDSN
NDSN Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NDSN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDSN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDSN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NDSN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDSN Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

MDT
MDT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDSN vs. MDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nordson Corporation (NDSN) and Medtronic plc (MDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NDSNMDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.96

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

-0.23

+2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.81

-0.56

+8.38

NDSN vs. MDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDSN Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the MDT Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDSN and MDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDSN vs. MDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDSN drawdown since its inception was -73.62%, which is greater than MDT's maximum drawdown of -57.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDSN and MDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDSNMDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.62%

-57.63%

-15.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

-28.90%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.15%

-28.90%

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.15%

-45.10%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.24%

-45.10%

+0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.41%

-31.23%

+27.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-16.55%

+3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

11.52%

-7.15%

Volatility

NDSN vs. MDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is 8.59%, while Medtronic plc (MDT) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that NDSN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDSNMDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.59%

9.32%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.87%

16.28%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.26%

21.07%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.78%

21.93%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.47%

23.25%

+5.22%

Dividends

NDSN vs. MDT - Dividend Comparison

NDSN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than MDT's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDT
Medtronic plc
3.54%2.95%3.49%3.34%3.44%2.39%1.95%1.87%2.15%2.24%2.34%1.88%
NDSN
Nordson Corporation
1.12%1.66%1.02%1.01%0.98%0.71%0.77%0.90%1.09%0.78%0.91%1.43%

Financials

NDSN vs. MDT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nordson Corporation and Medtronic plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
740.85M
9.02B
(NDSN) Total Revenue
(MDT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NDSN and MDT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDT has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to NDSN (8.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDSN dropped -73.62% vs MDT's -57.63%.

NDSN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDSN and MDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer