NDSN vs. LMT
NDSN (Nordson Corporation) and LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — NDSN in Specialty Industrial Machinery, LMT in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 10 years, NDSN returned 14.17%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for LMT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NDSN vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDSN achieves a 20.24% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, NDSN has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 14.17%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 11.37% annualized return.
NDSN
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 20.24%
- 6M
- 23.21%
- 1Y
- 34.03%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 14.17%
LMT
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 18.25%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
NDSN vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDSN Nordson Corporation | 20.24% | 17.03% | -20.15% | 12.39% | -5.93% | 28.09% | 24.45% | 37.88% | -17.65% | 31.83% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 13.04% | 2.47% | 10.02% | -4.31% | 40.48% | 3.15% | -6.49% | 52.55% | -16.35% | 31.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between NDSN and LMT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.25 |
The correlation between NDSN and LMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NDSN:
$16.17B
LMT:
$124.87B
NDSN:
$9.36
LMT:
$20.61
NDSN:
30.79
LMT:
26.21
NDSN:
5.60
LMT:
1.67
NDSN:
5.05
LMT:
16.67
NDSN:
$2.90B
LMT:
$75.12B
NDSN:
$1.60B
LMT:
$7.37B
NDSN:
$744.50M
LMT:
$8.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NDSN vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank
NDSN
LMT
NDSN vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nordson Corporation (NDSN) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NDSN | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.14 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 0.73 | +1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.81 | 1.69 | +6.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NDSN vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDSN drawdown since its inception was -73.62%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDSN and LMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDSN | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.62% | -79.29% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.15% | -25.15% | +11.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.15% | -31.79% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.15% | -31.79% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.24% | -36.67% | -7.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.41% | -19.63% | +16.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -26.83% | +13.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 10.81% | -6.44% |
Volatility
NDSN vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
Nordson Corporation (NDSN) has a higher volatility of 8.59% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 7.02%. This indicates that NDSN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NDSN | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.59% | 7.02% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | 20.04% | -4.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.26% | 26.71% | -5.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.78% | 22.99% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.47% | 23.76% | +4.71% |
Dividends
NDSN vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
NDSN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than LMT's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.53% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
NDSN Nordson Corporation | 1.12% | 1.66% | 1.02% | 1.01% | 0.98% | 0.71% | 0.77% | 0.90% | 1.09% | 0.78% | 0.91% | 1.43% |
Financials
NDSN vs. LMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nordson Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NDSN vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison
NDSN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordson Corporation reported a gross profit of 404.08M and revenue of 740.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.5%.
LMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.
NDSN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordson Corporation reported an operating income of 197.20M and revenue of 740.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
LMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
NDSN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordson Corporation reported a net income of 117.32M and revenue of 740.85M, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.
LMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NDSN and LMT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NDSN has higher volatility (8.59%) compared to LMT (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDSN dropped -73.62% vs LMT's -79.29%.
NDSN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NDSN and LMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer