NDMO vs. PFLT
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund (NDMO) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NDMO or PFLT.
Key characteristics
NDMO | PFLT | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 14.31% | 1.02% |
1Y Return | 17.02% | 13.56% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -5.82% | 3.47% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.52 | 1.02 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.39 | 1.38 |
Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.19 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.52 | 1.24 |
Martin Ratio | 8.81 | 2.49 |
Ulcer Index | 2.12% | 5.70% |
Daily Std Dev | 12.27% | 13.97% |
Max Drawdown | -42.54% | -69.77% |
Current Drawdown | -24.25% | -5.97% |
Fundamentals
NDMO | PFLT | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $634.93M | $821.58M |
EPS | $0.61 | $1.66 |
PE Ratio | 17.48 | 6.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between NDMO and PFLT is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
NDMO vs. PFLT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, NDMO achieves a 14.31% return, which is significantly higher than PFLT's 1.02% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NDMO vs. PFLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund (NDMO) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NDMO vs. PFLT - Dividend Comparison
NDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than PFLT's 11.00% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund | 6.37% | 7.81% | 9.30% | 5.55% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. | 11.00% | 9.98% | 10.38% | 8.93% | 10.83% | 9.36% | 9.85% | 8.31% | 8.08% | 10.04% | 7.87% | 7.63% |
Drawdowns
NDMO vs. PFLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDMO drawdown since its inception was -42.54%, smaller than the maximum PFLT drawdown of -69.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDMO and PFLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NDMO vs. PFLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund (NDMO) is 3.19%, while PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that NDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
NDMO vs. PFLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities