NDMO vs. PFLT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NDMO (Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund) and PFLT (PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — NDMO in Capital Markets, PFLT in Asset Management. Over the past 5 years, NDMO returned -2.75%/yr vs 1.67%/yr for PFLT. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NDMO vs. PFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund (NDMO) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDMO achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly higher than PFLT's -7.87% return.

NDMO

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 1.13%
• 1Y: 9.95%
• 3Y*: 6.28%
• 5Y*: -2.75%
• 10Y*: —

PFLT

• 1D: -3.48%
• 1M: -11.26%
• YTD: -7.87%
• 6M: -8.24%
• 1Y: -9.99%
• 3Y*: 2.12%
• 5Y*: 1.67%
• 10Y*: 6.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDMO vs. PFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NDMO Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund	5.30%	8.21%	8.31%	7.25%	-35.45%	12.12%	5.29%
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.	-7.87%	-4.17%	0.62%	23.05%	-5.53%	32.64%	30.13%

Correlation

The correlation between NDMO and PFLT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2020	0.19

The correlation between NDMO and PFLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NDMO vs. PFLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDMO

NDMO Risk / Return Rank: 68
NDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
NDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
NDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
NDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
NDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

PFLT

PFLT Risk / Return Rank: 21
PFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
PFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
PFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 19
PFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
PFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDMO vs. PFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund (NDMO) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NDMO	PFLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	-0.51	+1.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	-0.58	+2.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.93	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	-0.46	+2.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.05	-0.88	+4.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NDMO vs. PFLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the PFLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDMO and PFLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NDMO	PFLT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	-0.51	+1.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	0.08	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.25	-0.24

Drawdowns

NDMO vs. PFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDMO drawdown since its inception was -42.54%, smaller than the maximum PFLT drawdown of -69.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDMO and PFLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDMO	PFLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.54%	-69.77%	+27.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.96%	-21.90%	+15.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.02%	-22.96%	+6.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.54%	-29.64%	-12.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-69.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.21%	-17.83%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.45%	-8.07%	-13.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	11.33%	-8.87%

Volatility

NDMO vs. PFLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund (NDMO) is 2.65%, while PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that NDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NDMO	PFLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.65%	5.73%	-3.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.23%	16.05%	-7.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.66%	19.85%	-9.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.12%	21.11%	-4.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.60%	28.91%	-13.31%

Dividends

NDMO vs. PFLT - Dividend Comparison

NDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, less than PFLT's 15.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NDMO Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund	7.22%	7.38%	7.43%	7.80%	9.24%	5.52%	1.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.	15.28%	13.27%	11.25%	9.98%	10.38%	8.93%	10.83%	9.24%	9.59%	8.31%	8.08%	10.04%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDMO and PFLT in my portfolio?

NDMO and PFLT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NDMO or PFLT?

PFLT has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to NDMO (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDMO dropped -42.54% vs PFLT's -69.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.