PFLT vs. PDI
Compare and contrast key facts about PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI).
Performance
PFLT vs. PDI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFLT vs. PDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. | -10.49% | -4.17% | 0.62% | 23.05% | -5.53% | 32.64% | -1.41% | 15.52% | -8.29% | 5.49% |
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | 1.93% | 11.03% | 17.18% | 11.99% | -16.99% | 7.81% | -9.96% | 22.23% | 7.35% | 18.59% |
Fundamentals
PFLT:
$0.63
PDI:
$3.86
PFLT:
12.70
PDI:
4.52
PFLT:
0.07
PDI:
0.07
PFLT:
3.24
PDI:
3.34
PFLT:
$149.03M
PDI:
$2.03B
PFLT:
$48.69M
PDI:
$1.51B
PFLT:
$39.60M
PDI:
$2.09B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFLT achieves a -10.49% return, which is significantly lower than PDI's 1.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PFLT has underperformed PDI with an annualized return of 6.48%, while PDI has yielded a comparatively higher 8.32% annualized return.
PFLT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- -10.49%
- 6M
- -1.46%
- 1Y
- -18.09%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.68%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
PDI
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- -5.71%
- 1Y
- 1.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFLT vs. PDI — Risk / Return Rank
PFLT
PDI
PFLT vs. PDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFLT | PDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | 0.07 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | 0.21 | -1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.04 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 0.09 | -0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.70 | 0.26 | -1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFLT | PDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.77 | 0.07 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.25 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.44 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.60 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFLT and PDI is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PFLT vs. PDI - Dividend Comparison
PFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.36%, more than PDI's 15.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. | 15.36% | 13.27% | 11.25% | 9.98% | 10.38% | 8.93% | 10.83% | 9.24% | 9.59% | 8.31% | 8.08% | 10.04% |
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | 15.20% | 14.94% | 14.43% | 14.74% | 17.84% | 10.21% | 10.01% | 9.45% | 10.78% | 8.81% | 14.79% | 18.70% |
Drawdowns
PFLT vs. PDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFLT drawdown since its inception was -69.77%, which is greater than PDI's maximum drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLT and PDI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFLT | PDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.77% | -46.47% | -23.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.90% | -14.34% | -7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -27.23% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.77% | -46.47% | -23.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.17% | -6.04% | -14.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -6.22% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.91% | 5.04% | +5.87% |
Volatility
PFLT vs. PDI - Volatility Comparison
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) at 6.01%. This indicates that PFLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFLT | PDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 6.01% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.40% | 10.12% | +5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.55% | 18.44% | +5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.93% | 15.68% | +5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.80% | 19.06% | +9.74% |
Financials
PFLT vs. PDI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PFLT vs. PDI - Profitability Comparison
PFLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 29.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PDI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund reported a gross profit of 558.21M and revenue of 615.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.7%.
PFLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 29.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
PDI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund reported an operating income of 529.42M and revenue of 615.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 86.1%.
PFLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 29.47M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
PDI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund reported a net income of 457.73M and revenue of 615.21M, resulting in a net margin of 74.4%.