PFLT vs. PNNT
Compare and contrast key facts about PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT).
Performance
PFLT vs. PNNT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFLT vs. PNNT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. | -10.49% | -4.17% | 0.62% | 23.05% | -5.53% | 32.64% | -1.41% | 15.52% | -8.29% | 5.49% |
PNNT PennantPark Investment Corporation | -23.23% | -2.96% | 16.56% | 37.25% | -8.90% | 61.71% | -17.99% | 14.30% | 2.05% | -0.65% |
Fundamentals
PFLT:
$0.63
PNNT:
$0.39
PFLT:
12.70
PNNT:
11.07
PFLT:
0.07
PNNT:
0.06
PFLT:
3.24
PNNT:
3.54
PFLT:
$149.03M
PNNT:
$80.02M
PFLT:
$48.69M
PNNT:
$36.06M
PFLT:
$39.60M
PNNT:
$26.12M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFLT achieves a -10.49% return, which is significantly higher than PNNT's -23.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PFLT has underperformed PNNT with an annualized return of 6.48%, while PNNT has yielded a comparatively higher 8.85% annualized return.
PFLT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- -10.49%
- 6M
- -1.46%
- 1Y
- -18.09%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.68%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
PNNT
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -12.47%
- YTD
- -23.23%
- 6M
- -27.74%
- 1Y
- -27.99%
- 3Y*
- 7.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFLT vs. PNNT — Risk / Return Rank
PFLT
PNNT
PFLT vs. PNNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFLT | PNNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | -1.01 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | -1.34 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.83 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.79 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.70 | -1.97 | +0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFLT | PNNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.77 | -1.01 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.29 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.27 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.15 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFLT and PNNT is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PFLT vs. PNNT - Dividend Comparison
PFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.36%, less than PNNT's 21.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. | 15.36% | 13.27% | 11.25% | 9.98% | 10.38% | 8.93% | 10.83% | 9.24% | 9.59% | 8.31% | 8.08% | 10.04% |
PNNT PennantPark Investment Corporation | 21.97% | 16.11% | 12.85% | 11.65% | 10.43% | 6.93% | 11.71% | 11.03% | 11.30% | 10.42% | 14.62% | 18.12% |
Drawdowns
PFLT vs. PNNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFLT drawdown since its inception was -69.77%, smaller than the maximum PNNT drawdown of -82.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLT and PNNT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFLT | PNNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.77% | -82.16% | +12.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.90% | -34.80% | +12.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -34.80% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.77% | -69.14% | -0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.17% | -34.65% | +14.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -15.10% | +7.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.91% | 13.95% | -3.04% |
Volatility
PFLT vs. PNNT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) is 7.48%, while PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that PFLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFLT | PNNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 11.47% | -3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.40% | 19.93% | -4.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.55% | 27.77% | -4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.93% | 23.20% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.80% | 32.55% | -3.75% |
Financials
PFLT vs. PNNT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. and PennantPark Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PFLT vs. PNNT - Profitability Comparison
PFLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 29.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PNNT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Investment Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.87M and revenue of 27.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.2%.
PFLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 29.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
PNNT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Investment Corporation reported an operating income of 7.65M and revenue of 27.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.1%.
PFLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 29.47M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
PNNT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Investment Corporation reported a net income of 8.96M and revenue of 27.25M, resulting in a net margin of 32.9%.