PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PFLT vs. PNNT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


PFLTPNNT
YTD Return1.66%12.12%
1Y Return26.51%28.88%
3Y Return (Ann)4.38%13.47%
5Y Return (Ann)10.78%15.61%
10Y Return (Ann)7.79%7.81%
Sharpe Ratio2.001.85
Sortino Ratio2.622.47
Omega Ratio1.371.34
Calmar Ratio1.582.04
Martin Ratio5.215.65
Ulcer Index5.56%5.49%
Daily Std Dev14.48%16.73%
Max Drawdown-69.77%-82.16%
Current Drawdown-5.38%-7.64%

Fundamentals


PFLTPNNT
Market Cap$843.60M$459.03M
EPS$1.63$0.66
PE Ratio6.9010.56
PEG Ratio0.270.28
Total Revenue (TTM)$120.75M$70.58M
Gross Profit (TTM)$93.87M$47.35M
EBITDA (TTM)$101.73M$54.21M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between PFLT and PNNT is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

PFLT vs. PNNT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PFLT achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than PNNT's 12.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PFLT having a 7.79% annualized return and PNNT not far ahead at 7.81%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
4.38%
4.44%
PFLT
PNNT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PFLT vs. PNNT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFLT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PFLT, currently valued at 2.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.00
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PFLT, currently valued at 2.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.62
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PFLT, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PFLT, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PFLT, currently valued at 5.21, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.005.21
PNNT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PNNT, currently valued at 1.85, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PNNT, currently valued at 2.46, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.47
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PNNT, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PNNT, currently valued at 2.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PNNT, currently valued at 5.65, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.005.65

PFLT vs. PNNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFLT Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the PNNT Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFLT and PNNT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
2.00
1.85
PFLT
PNNT

Dividends

PFLT vs. PNNT - Dividend Comparison

PFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.93%, less than PNNT's 12.77% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
10.93%9.98%10.38%8.93%10.83%9.36%9.85%8.31%8.08%10.04%7.87%7.63%
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
12.77%11.65%10.43%6.93%11.71%11.03%11.30%10.42%14.62%18.12%11.75%9.66%

Drawdowns

PFLT vs. PNNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFLT drawdown since its inception was -69.77%, smaller than the maximum PNNT drawdown of -82.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLT and PNNT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-5.38%
-7.64%
PFLT
PNNT

Volatility

PFLT vs. PNNT - Volatility Comparison

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) at 3.12%. This indicates that PFLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PNNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
5.35%
3.12%
PFLT
PNNT

Financials

PFLT vs. PNNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. and PennantPark Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items