PFLT vs. PNNT
PFLT (PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.) and PNNT (PennantPark Investment Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, PFLT returned 4.35%/yr vs 4.27%/yr for PNNT. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PFLT vs. PNNT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFLT achieves a -18.83% return, which is significantly higher than PNNT's -38.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PFLT having a 4.35% annualized return and PNNT not far behind at 4.27%.
PFLT
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- 6M
- -21.14%
- YTD
- -18.83%
- 1Y
- -23.65%
- 3Y*
- -4.27%
- 5Y*
- -1.47%
- 10Y*
- 4.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.94%
PNNT
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- 6M
- -37.47%
- YTD
- -38.03%
- 1Y
- -45.04%
- 3Y*
- -7.86%
- 5Y*
- -0.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.63M | $9.40M | $9.33M | |
| $1.98M | $2.06M | $3.07M |
PFLT vs. PNNT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. | -18.83% | -4.17% | 0.62% | 23.05% | -5.53% | 32.64% | -1.41% | 15.52% | -8.29% | 5.49% |
PNNT PennantPark Investment Corporation | -38.03% | -2.96% | 16.56% | 37.25% | -8.90% | 61.71% | -17.99% | 14.30% | 2.05% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFLT and PNNT is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, PFLT and PNNT have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
PFLT:
$688.57M
PNNT:
$214.82M
PFLT:
$1.79
PNNT:
$341.38
PFLT:
3.88
PNNT:
0.01
PFLT:
0.02
PNNT:
0.00
PFLT:
2.00
PNNT:
1.67
PFLT:
$229.78M
PNNT:
$85.01M
PFLT:
$45.40M
PNNT:
$24.12M
PFLT:
$38.59M
PNNT:
$16.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFLT vs. PNNT — Risk / Return Rank
PFLT
PNNT
PFLT vs. PNNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFLT | PNNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.71 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | -0.96 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.97 | -1.77 | -0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFLT vs. PNNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFLT drawdown since its inception was -69.77%, smaller than the maximum PNNT drawdown of -82.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLT and PNNT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFLT | PNNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.77% | -82.16% | +12.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.25% | -47.66% | +22.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.44% | -48.22% | +19.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -48.22% | +18.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.77% | -69.14% | -0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.61% | -47.26% | +19.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -15.50% | +7.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.29% | 25.83% | -13.54% |
Volatility
PFLT vs. PNNT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) is 6.65%, while PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that PFLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFLT | PNNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 8.08% | -1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.40% | 25.28% | -6.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.03% | 28.81% | -6.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 23.88% | -2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.09% | 32.93% | -3.84% |
Dividends
PFLT vs. PNNT - Dividend Comparison
PFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.12%, less than PNNT's 27.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. | 17.12% | 13.27% | 11.25% | 9.98% | 10.38% | 8.93% | 10.83% | 9.24% | 9.59% | 8.31% | 8.08% | 10.04% |
PNNT PennantPark Investment Corporation | 27.96% | 16.11% | 12.85% | 11.65% | 10.43% | 6.93% | 11.71% | 11.03% | 11.30% | 10.42% | 14.62% | 18.12% |
Financials
PFLT vs. PNNT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. and PennantPark Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PFLT and PNNT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNNT has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to PFLT (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFLT dropped -69.77% vs PNNT's -82.16%.
PFLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.10 vs -1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFLT and PNNT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer