PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDMAX vs. NWLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDMAX vs. NWLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) and Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDMAX achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly higher than NWLSX's 8.28% return. Over the past 10 years, NDMAX has outperformed NWLSX with an annualized return of 9.11%, while NWLSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.44% annualized return.


NDMAX

1D
0.19%
1M
4.31%
YTD
10.65%
6M
11.68%
1Y
24.02%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
9.11%

NWLSX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.77%
YTD
8.28%
6M
9.06%
1Y
20.30%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
8.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDMAX vs. NWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDMAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund
10.65%15.92%12.14%18.16%-17.78%14.69%12.86%19.67%-8.68%15.70%
NWLSX
Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund
8.28%16.16%10.17%17.00%-17.70%13.33%12.81%18.63%-8.01%15.06%

Correlation

The correlation between NDMAX and NWLSX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.99

The correlation between NDMAX and NWLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDMAX vs. NWLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDMAX
NDMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NDMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NDMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

NWLSX
NWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
NWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDMAX vs. NWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) and Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NDMAXNWLSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

2.35

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.41

3.39

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.00

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.58

13.40

+0.18

NDMAX vs. NWLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the NWLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDMAX and NWLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NDMAXNWLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.35

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.54

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.62

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.38

+0.01

Drawdowns

NDMAX vs. NWLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDMAX drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, smaller than the maximum NWLSX drawdown of -52.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDMAX and NWLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDMAXNWLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.85%

-52.58%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-6.88%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.33%

-10.73%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

-29.54%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.00%

-30.59%

-2.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-8.57%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.54%

+0.26%

Volatility

NDMAX vs. NWLSX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX) at 2.78%. This indicates that NDMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDMAXNWLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.78%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.31%

7.13%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.25%

8.79%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.65%

12.95%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.48%

13.71%

+0.77%

NDMAX vs. NWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDMAX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than NWLSX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDMAX vs. NWLSX - Dividend Comparison

NDMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.43%, more than NWLSX's 7.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NDMAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund
8.43%9.28%16.19%6.30%3.88%5.83%5.68%8.26%14.63%10.61%8.26%7.82%
NWLSX
Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund
7.82%8.36%14.07%7.04%2.15%9.62%5.85%6.95%11.27%7.78%6.64%5.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, NDMAX and NWLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NDMAX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to NWLSX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDMAX dropped -47.85% vs NWLSX's -52.58%.

NDMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDMAX and NWLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer