PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDMAX vs. MUIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDMAX vs. MUIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) and Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDMAX achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than MUIGX's 9.31% return. Over the past 10 years, NDMAX has underperformed MUIGX with an annualized return of 9.46%, while MUIGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.90% annualized return.


NDMAX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.91%
YTD
10.76%
6M
10.18%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
9.46%

MUIGX

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
9.31%
6M
8.35%
1Y
24.56%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
16.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDMAX vs. MUIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDMAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund
10.76%15.92%12.14%18.16%-17.78%14.69%12.86%19.67%-8.68%15.70%
MUIGX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund
9.31%17.35%22.33%24.28%-21.86%30.48%19.17%47.45%-0.65%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NDMAX and MUIGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2000

0.91

The correlation between NDMAX and MUIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDMAX vs. MUIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDMAX
NDMAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NDMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NDMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

MUIGX
MUIGX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MUIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MUIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDMAX vs. MUIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) and Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NDMAXMUIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.37

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.89

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.32

12.57

+0.76

NDMAX vs. MUIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the MUIGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDMAX and MUIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDMAX vs. MUIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDMAX drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, smaller than the maximum MUIGX drawdown of -68.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDMAX and MUIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDMAXMUIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.85%

-68.10%

+20.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-8.95%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.33%

-18.02%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

-27.33%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.00%

-32.70%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-1.95%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-16.86%

+8.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.06%

-0.23%

Volatility

NDMAX vs. MUIGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) is 4.22%, while Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that NDMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDMAXMUIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

4.72%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

9.87%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.87%

12.54%

-1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

17.07%

-3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

18.54%

-4.03%

NDMAX vs. MUIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDMAX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than MUIGX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDMAX vs. MUIGX - Dividend Comparison

NDMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%, more than MUIGX's 4.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUIGX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund
4.53%4.96%4.60%1.41%1.15%7.64%2.77%14.46%48.57%10.32%5.60%4.96%
NDMAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund
8.24%9.28%16.19%6.30%3.88%5.83%5.68%8.26%14.63%10.61%8.26%7.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, NDMAX and MUIGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MUIGX has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to NDMAX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDMAX dropped -47.85% vs MUIGX's -68.10%.

NDMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDMAX and MUIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer