PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUIGX vs. NWHVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUIGX achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than NWHVX's -2.62% return. Over the past 10 years, MUIGX has outperformed NWHVX with an annualized return of 16.66%, while NWHVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.89% annualized return.


MUIGX

1D
0.25%
1M
5.36%
YTD
11.32%
6M
11.48%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
12.54%
10Y*
16.66%

NWHVX

1D
1.07%
1M
2.16%
YTD
-2.62%
6M
-3.14%
1Y
-6.83%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
8.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUIGX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund
11.32%17.35%22.33%24.28%-21.86%30.48%19.17%47.45%-0.65%27.24%
NWHVX
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund
-2.62%-2.38%9.89%23.84%-28.32%25.03%31.17%29.96%-2.97%23.11%

Correlation

The correlation between MUIGX and NWHVX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2013

0.87

The correlation between MUIGX and NWHVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUIGX vs. NWHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUIGX
MUIGX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MUIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MUIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NWHVX
NWHVX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NWHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NWHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUIGXNWHVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

-0.47

+2.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.41

-0.57

+3.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

0.94

+0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

-0.37

+3.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.81

-0.83

+15.63

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the NWHVX Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUIGX and NWHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUIGXNWHVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

-0.47

+2.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.09

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.45

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.45

0.00

Drawdowns

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUIGX drawdown since its inception was -68.10%, which is greater than NWHVX's maximum drawdown of -37.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUIGX and NWHVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUIGXNWHVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.10%

-37.12%

-30.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-17.82%

+8.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-19.80%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.33%

-37.12%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.70%

-37.12%

+4.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.85%

+11.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.88%

-7.83%

-9.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

7.90%

-5.91%

Volatility

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX) is 3.16%, while Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that MUIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NWHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUIGXNWHVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

4.11%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.01%

11.39%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.89%

14.48%

-2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

19.87%

-2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.49%

19.68%

-1.19%

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUIGX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NWHVX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Dividend Comparison

MUIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than NWHVX's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUIGX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund
4.44%4.96%4.60%1.41%1.15%7.64%2.77%14.46%48.57%10.32%5.60%4.96%
NWHVX
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund
8.18%7.96%11.93%16.14%36.45%34.64%6.16%18.85%38.53%11.37%8.97%13.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUIGX and NWHVX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NWHVX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to MUIGX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUIGX dropped -68.10% vs NWHVX's -37.12%.

MUIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUIGX and NWHVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer