MUIGX vs. NWHVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MUIGX (Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund) and NWHVX (Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - MUIGX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Nationwide, while NWHVX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Nationwide. Over the past 10 years, MUIGX returned 16.67%/yr vs 8.86%/yr for NWHVX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MUIGX charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for NWHVX.

Performance

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUIGX achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than NWHVX's -2.90% return. Over the past 10 years, MUIGX has outperformed NWHVX with an annualized return of 16.67%, while NWHVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.86% annualized return.

MUIGX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 6.08%
• YTD: 11.48%
• 6M: 11.29%
• 1Y: 28.42%
• 3Y*: 21.38%
• 5Y*: 12.68%
• 10Y*: 16.67%

NWHVX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 2.87%
• YTD: -2.90%
• 6M: -4.24%
• 1Y: -7.86%
• 3Y*: 6.06%
• 5Y*: 1.82%
• 10Y*: 8.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MUIGX Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund	11.48%	17.35%	22.33%	24.28%	-21.86%	30.48%	19.17%	47.45%	-0.65%	27.24%
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund	-2.90%	-2.38%	9.89%	23.84%	-28.32%	25.03%	31.17%	29.96%	-2.97%	23.11%

Correlation

The correlation between MUIGX and NWHVX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2013	0.87

The correlation between MUIGX and NWHVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MUIGX vs. NWHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUIGX

MUIGX Risk / Return Rank: 70
MUIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MUIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
MUIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
MUIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MUIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

NWHVX

NWHVX Risk / Return Rank: 1
NWHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MUIGX	NWHVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	-0.49	+2.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	-0.61	+4.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	0.93	+0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	-0.40	+3.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.74	-0.90	+15.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the NWHVX Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUIGX and NWHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MUIGX	NWHVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	-0.49	+2.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.09	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	0.45	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.45	0.00

Drawdowns

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUIGX drawdown since its inception was -68.10%, which is greater than NWHVX's maximum drawdown of -37.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUIGX and NWHVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUIGX	NWHVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.10%	-37.12%	-30.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.95%	-17.82%	+8.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.02%	-19.80%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.33%	-37.12%	+9.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.70%	-37.12%	+4.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-12.11%	+12.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.88%	-7.83%	-9.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	7.92%	-5.93%

Volatility

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX) is 3.16%, while Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that MUIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NWHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUIGX	NWHVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.16%	4.07%	-0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	11.39%	-2.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.86%	14.45%	-2.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.99%	19.87%	-2.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.49%	19.68%	-1.19%

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUIGX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NWHVX's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUIGX vs. NWHVX - Dividend Comparison

MUIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than NWHVX's 8.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MUIGX Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund	4.43%	4.96%	4.60%	1.41%	1.15%	7.64%	2.77%	14.46%	48.57%	10.32%	5.60%	4.96%
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund	8.20%	7.96%	11.93%	16.14%	36.45%	34.64%	6.16%	18.85%	38.53%	11.37%	8.97%	13.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUIGX and NWHVX in my portfolio?

MUIGX and NWHVX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MUIGX or NWHVX?

NWHVX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to MUIGX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUIGX dropped -68.10% vs NWHVX's -37.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.