NDIV vs. XLE
NDIV (Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - NDIV tracks the EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index while XLE tracks the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NDIV returned 18.96%/yr vs 17.46%/yr for XLE. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NDIV charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
NDIV vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NDIV having a 32.65% return and XLE slightly lower at 32.17%.
NDIV
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- 32.65%
- 6M
- 28.18%
- 1Y
- 34.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 32.17%
- 6M
- 29.80%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 20.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
NDIV vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 32.65% | 2.85% | 6.18% | 15.52% | 1.82% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 32.17% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between NDIV and XLE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022 | 0.83 |
The correlation between NDIV and XLE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
NDIV vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NDIV
XLE
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
NDIV
XLE
Basic Materials
NDIV
XLE
-
Financial Services
NDIV
XLE
-
Communication Services
NDIV
-
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
NDIV
-
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
NDIV
-
XLE
-
Healthcare
NDIV
-
XLE
-
Industrials
NDIV
-
XLE
-
Real Estate
NDIV
-
XLE
-
Technology
NDIV
-
XLE
-
Utilities
NDIV
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NDIV vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
NDIV
XLE
NDIV vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NDIV | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.75 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | 10.92 | -3.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NDIV | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 2.21 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.31 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
NDIV vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDIV drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIV and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDIV | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.73% | -71.26% | +51.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | -12.05% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | -20.14% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -6.15% | +2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -17.98% | +13.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 4.14% | +0.41% |
Volatility
NDIV vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) is 4.65%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that NDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NDIV | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 8.25% | -3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.38% | 16.58% | -3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.04% | 20.53% | -0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 26.02% | -5.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 29.59% | -8.67% |
NDIV vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDIV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
NDIV vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
NDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than XLE's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 6.53% | 5.64% | 5.88% | 7.37% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.54% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NDIV and XLE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to NDIV (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDIV dropped -19.73% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 3-year performance, NDIV leads with 18.96% vs 17.46% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, NDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NDIV has performed better with a 18.96% return vs 17.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for NDIV.
NDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 2.54% for XLE.
NDIV tracks EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for NDIV and 0.08% for XLE.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NDIV and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer