NDIV vs. QDVO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO).

NDIV and QDVO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NDIV is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index. It was launched on Aug 24, 2022. QDVO is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Aug 22, 2024.

Performance

NDIV vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NDIV vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF	32.07%	2.85%	-0.88%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	-4.93%	20.16%	11.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDIV achieves a 32.07% return, which is significantly higher than QDVO's -4.93% return.

NDIV

• 1D: -2.80%
• 1M: 5.95%
• YTD: 32.07%
• 6M: 25.89%
• 1Y: 27.53%
• 3Y*: 18.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDVO

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -2.96%
• YTD: -4.93%
• 6M: -2.40%
• 1Y: 21.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDIV vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDIV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.

NDIV

Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF

QDVO

Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF

Return for Risk

NDIV vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDIV

NDIV Risk / Return Rank: 57
NDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
NDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
NDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
NDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
NDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 48

QDVO

QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 70
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDIV vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NDIV	QDVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	1.14	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	1.79	-0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.26	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	2.13	-0.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.86	7.94	-3.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NDIV vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the QDVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDIV and QDVO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NDIV	QDVO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	1.14	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.92	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between NDIV and QDVO is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NDIV vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

NDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, less than QDVO's 11.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF	5.23%	5.64%	5.88%	7.37%	1.69%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	11.17%	9.92%	2.79%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NDIV vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDIV drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIV and QDVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDIV	QDVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.73%	-17.75%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.75%	-10.24%	-7.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.04%	-6.70%	+2.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.27%	-2.51%	-1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.77%	2.75%	+3.02%

Volatility

NDIV vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) is 4.93%, while Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that NDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NDIV	QDVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.93%	5.38%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.42%	9.78%	+4.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.59%	18.61%	+5.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.02%	18.01%	+3.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.02%	18.01%	+3.01%