NDIA vs. IMVP

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

NDIA (Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF) and IMVP (Invesco India ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NDIA is a India Equities fund actively managed by Global X, while IMVP is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index. NDIA is actively managed, while IMVP is passively managed. Over the past year, NDIA returned -9.19% vs -16.76% for IMVP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NDIA charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for IMVP.

Performance

NDIA vs. IMVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA) and Invesco India ETF (IMVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDIA achieves a -8.77% return, which is significantly higher than IMVP's -15.12% return.

NDIA

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: -7.66%
• YTD: -8.77%
• 1Y: -9.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMVP

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.56%
• 6M: -13.81%
• YTD: -15.12%
• 1Y: -16.76%
• 3Y*: 1.59%
• 5Y*: 3.02%
• 10Y*: 7.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDIA vs. IMVP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF	-8.77%	5.04%	5.75%	12.76%
IMVP Invesco India ETF	-15.12%	1.30%	9.07%	13.44%

Correlation

The correlation between NDIA and IMVP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2023	0.88

The correlation between NDIA and IMVP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NDIA vs. IMVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDIA

NDIA Risk / Return Rank: 4
NDIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
NDIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NDIA Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NDIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
NDIA Martin Ratio Rank: 3

IMVP

IMVP Risk / Return Rank: 2
IMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
IMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDIA vs. IMVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA) and Invesco India ETF (IMVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NDIA	IMVP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.57	-1.03	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.74	-1.42	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	0.84	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	-0.82	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	-1.67	+0.41

NDIA vs. IMVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDIA Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is higher than the IMVP Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDIA and IMVP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NDIA vs. IMVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDIA drawdown since its inception was -22.05%, smaller than the maximum IMVP drawdown of -64.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIA and IMVP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDIA	IMVP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.05%	-64.54%	+42.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.09%	-20.45%	+3.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.80%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.80%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.41%	-22.83%	+7.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.40%	-16.74%	+9.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.34%	10.07%	-2.73%

Volatility

NDIA vs. IMVP - Volatility Comparison

Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Invesco India ETF (IMVP) at 3.79%. This indicates that NDIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NDIA	IMVP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	3.79%	+0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.03%	14.39%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.09%	16.40%	-0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.59%	16.18%	-0.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.59%	19.49%	-3.90%

NDIA vs. IMVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDIA has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than IMVP's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

NDIA vs. IMVP - Dividend Comparison

NDIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than IMVP's 11.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMVP Invesco India ETF	11.87%	7.39%	8.48%	2.08%	14.07%	6.95%	0.72%	36.35%	0.96%	1.01%	1.18%	0.61%
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF	1.20%	1.10%	3.66%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDIA and IMVP in my portfolio?

NDIA and IMVP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NDIA or IMVP?

NDIA has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to IMVP (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDIA dropped -22.05% vs IMVP's -64.54%.

Which ETF is better, NDIA or IMVP?

On 1-year performance, NDIA leads with -9.19% vs -16.76% for IMVP. On fees, NDIA is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, IMVP has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NDIA or IMVP?

Over the 1-year period, NDIA has performed better with a -9.19% return vs -16.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NDIA or IMVP?

NDIA is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IMVP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NDIA or IMVP?

IMVP has the higher dividend yield at 11.87%, compared with 1.20% for NDIA.

What is the main difference between NDIA and IMVP?

NDIA is categorized as India Equities, while IMVP is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for NDIA and 0.78% for IMVP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NDIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.