NDIA vs. HMCH.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NDIA (Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF) and HMCH.L (HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NDIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Global X, while HMCH.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD. NDIA is actively managed, while HMCH.L is passively managed. Over the past year, NDIA returned -11.48% vs 0.39% for HMCH.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NDIA charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for HMCH.L.

Performance

NDIA vs. HMCH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

NDIA is traded in USD, while HMCH.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HMCH.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDIA achieves a -11.53% return, which is significantly lower than HMCH.L's -9.56% return.

NDIA

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: -11.53%
• 6M: -9.70%
• 1Y: -11.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HMCH.L

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -9.03%
• YTD: -9.56%
• 6M: -9.99%
• 1Y: 0.39%
• 3Y*: 8.64%
• 5Y*: -5.29%
• 10Y*: 5.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDIA vs. HMCH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF	-11.53%	5.04%	5.75%	12.76%
HMCH.L HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF	-9.56%	32.14%	18.72%	-6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NDIA and HMCH.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2023	0.19

NDIA vs. HMCH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NDIA	HMCH.L
Financial Services	32.7%	18.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	24.9%
Industrials	10.3%	5.4%
Energy	9.9%	3.7%
Technology	7.1%	12.2%
Basic Materials	7.0%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	3.0%
Communication Services	5.6%	18.1%
Utilities	3.6%	1.8%
Healthcare	3.4%	5.1%
Real Estate	3.0%	1.6%

Return for Risk

NDIA vs. HMCH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDIA

NDIA Risk / Return Rank: 3
NDIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
NDIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NDIA Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NDIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
NDIA Martin Ratio Rank: 1

HMCH.L

HMCH.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
HMCH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
HMCH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
HMCH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
HMCH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
HMCH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDIA vs. HMCH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NDIA	HMCH.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	0.02	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.98	0.17	-1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.02	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.64	0.02	-0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.52	0.04	-1.56

NDIA vs. HMCH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDIA Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the HMCH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDIA and HMCH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NDIA vs. HMCH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDIA drawdown since its inception was -22.05%, smaller than the maximum HMCH.L drawdown of -62.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIA and HMCH.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDIA	HMCH.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.05%	-62.58%	+40.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.03%	-18.56%	+0.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.44%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-56.33%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.96%	-36.42%	+18.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.16%	-23.87%	+16.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.58%	8.72%	-1.14%

Volatility

NDIA vs. HMCH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA) is 4.44%, while HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCH.L) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that NDIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMCH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NDIA	HMCH.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.44%	6.96%	-2.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.65%	14.29%	-0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.87%	19.51%	-3.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.61%	29.46%	-13.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.61%	26.29%	-10.68%

NDIA vs. HMCH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDIA has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than HMCH.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

NDIA vs. HMCH.L - Dividend Comparison

NDIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than HMCH.L's 2.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HMCH.L HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF	2.20%	2.34%	2.17%	2.12%	1.85%	1.28%	0.92%	1.65%	1.36%	0.78%	1.89%	2.84%
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF	1.24%	1.10%	3.66%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDIA and HMCH.L in my portfolio?

NDIA and HMCH.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NDIA or HMCH.L?

On fees, HMCH.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NDIA or HMCH.L?

HMCH.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for NDIA.

What is the main difference between NDIA and HMCH.L?

NDIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while HMCH.L is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for NDIA and 0.30% for HMCH.L.