NDAQ vs. PDBC
NDAQ (Nasdaq, Inc.) is a stock, while PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) is Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Over the past 10 years, NDAQ returned 16.67%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for PDBC. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NDAQ vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDAQ achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, NDAQ has outperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 16.67%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.61% annualized return.
NDAQ
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 11.95%
- 6M
- 7.58%
- YTD
- -1.99%
- 1Y
- -0.61%
- 3Y*
- 25.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- 16.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.07%
PDBC
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 18.25%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 1Y
- 35.58%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | $368.48M | $369.14M | $354.79M |
| $121.86M | $152.61M | $122.20M |
NDAQ vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | -1.99% | 27.19% | 34.85% | -3.66% | -11.19% | 60.13% | 25.99% | 33.88% | 8.21% | 16.76% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 28.15% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between NDAQ and PDBC is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014 | 0.11 |
The correlation between NDAQ and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NDAQ vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
NDAQ
PDBC
NDAQ vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NDAQ | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.31 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 2.16 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 7.07 | -7.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NDAQ vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDAQ drawdown since its inception was -68.48%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDAQ and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDAQ | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.48% | -49.52% | -18.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.39% | -16.55% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | -16.55% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.84% | -27.63% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.31% | -40.73% | +2.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.72% | -10.21% | +4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.74% | -23.02% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.76% | 5.05% | +5.71% |
Volatility
NDAQ vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 7.58%. This indicates that NDAQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NDAQ | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.52% | 7.58% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.17% | 16.65% | +5.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.31% | 19.73% | +7.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 19.28% | +5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.59% | 17.85% | +6.74% |
Dividends
NDAQ vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
NDAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than PDBC's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | 1.18% | 1.08% | 1.22% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.00% | 1.46% | 1.73% | 2.08% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.55% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.00% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NDAQ and PDBC have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NDAQ has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to PDBC (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDAQ dropped -68.48% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NDAQ and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer