PortfoliosLab logo
NDAQ vs. ICE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NDAQ and ICE is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

NDAQ vs. ICE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NDAQ:

1.51

ICE:

1.58

Sortino Ratio

NDAQ:

2.04

ICE:

2.09

Omega Ratio

NDAQ:

1.29

ICE:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

NDAQ:

1.73

ICE:

2.10

Martin Ratio

NDAQ:

6.25

ICE:

6.08

Ulcer Index

NDAQ:

5.68%

ICE:

4.91%

Daily Std Dev

NDAQ:

23.98%

ICE:

18.75%

Max Drawdown

NDAQ:

-68.48%

ICE:

-73.94%

Current Drawdown

NDAQ:

-2.90%

ICE:

-3.58%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NDAQ:

$46.83B

ICE:

$99.15B

EPS

NDAQ:

$2.21

ICE:

$4.82

PE Ratio

NDAQ:

36.91

ICE:

35.86

PEG Ratio

NDAQ:

1.63

ICE:

2.85

PS Ratio

NDAQ:

5.99

ICE:

10.48

PB Ratio

NDAQ:

4.02

ICE:

3.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

NDAQ:

$7.81B

ICE:

$12.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NDAQ:

$4.28B

ICE:

$6.98B

EBITDA (TTM)

NDAQ:

$2.52B

ICE:

$6.14B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDAQ achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than ICE's 15.71% return. Over the past 10 years, NDAQ has outperformed ICE with an annualized return of 18.87%, while ICE has yielded a comparatively lower 15.17% annualized return.


NDAQ

YTD

5.20%

1M

11.38%

6M

2.13%

1Y

36.03%

5Y*

18.50%

10Y*

18.87%

ICE

YTD

15.71%

1M

7.60%

6M

10.96%

1Y

29.46%

5Y*

14.50%

10Y*

15.17%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NDAQ vs. ICE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDAQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NDAQ is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NDAQ is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NDAQ is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NDAQ is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NDAQ is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NDAQ is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ICE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ICE is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ICE is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ICE is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ICE is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ICE is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ICE is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NDAQ vs. ICE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NDAQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the ICE Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDAQ and ICE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

NDAQ vs. ICE - Dividend Comparison

NDAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than ICE's 1.06% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
1.18%1.22%1.48%1.27%1.00%1.46%1.73%2.08%1.90%1.80%1.55%1.21%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
1.06%1.21%1.31%1.48%0.97%1.04%1.19%1.27%1.13%1.21%1.13%1.19%

Drawdowns

NDAQ vs. ICE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDAQ drawdown since its inception was -68.48%, smaller than the maximum ICE drawdown of -73.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDAQ and ICE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

NDAQ vs. ICE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) is 5.71%, while Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that NDAQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NDAQ vs. ICE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nasdaq, Inc. and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
2.09B
3.23B
(NDAQ) Total Revenue
(ICE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NDAQ vs. ICE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nasdaq, Inc. and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
82.9%
55.1%
(NDAQ) Gross Margin
(ICE) Gross Margin
NDAQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Nasdaq, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 2.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.9%.

ICE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78B and revenue of 3.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.1%.

NDAQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Nasdaq, Inc. reported an operating income of 547.00M and revenue of 2.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.

ICE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 3.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.8%.

NDAQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Nasdaq, Inc. reported a net income of 395.00M and revenue of 2.09B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.

ICE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a net income of 797.00M and revenue of 3.23B, resulting in a net margin of 24.7%.