PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDAQ vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDAQ vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDAQ achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 451.56% return.


NDAQ

1D
1.00%
1M
11.95%
6M
7.58%
YTD
-1.99%
1Y
-0.61%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
16.67%
ALL TIME*
14.07%

MUU

1D
0.22%
1M
-27.29%
6M
233.36%
YTD
451.56%
1Y
3,034.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
458.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.51B$1.48B$2.30B
$368.48M$369.14M$354.79M

NDAQ vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
-1.99%27.19%6.99%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
451.56%599.03%-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between NDAQ and MUU is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

0.09

The correlation between NDAQ and MUU shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDAQ vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NDAQ
NDAQ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
NDAQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDAQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDAQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
NDAQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDAQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NDAQ vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NDAQMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-19.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.63

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

45.22

-45.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.06

143.78

-143.84

NDAQ vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDAQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 19.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDAQ and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDAQ vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDAQ drawdown since its inception was -68.48%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDAQ and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDAQMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.48%

-75.07%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.39%

-68.07%

+44.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.72%

-55.06%

+49.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.74%

-24.55%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.76%

21.37%

-10.61%

Volatility

NDAQ vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) is 8.52%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 62.67%. This indicates that NDAQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDAQMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

62.67%

-54.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.17%

133.72%

-111.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.31%

161.71%

-134.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.65%

146.59%

-121.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.59%

146.59%

-122.00%

Dividends

NDAQ vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

NDAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than MUU's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
1.23%4.27%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
1.18%1.08%1.22%1.48%1.27%1.00%1.46%1.73%2.08%1.90%1.80%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


NDAQ and MUU have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (62.67%) compared to NDAQ (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDAQ dropped -68.48% vs MUU's -75.07%.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.04 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDAQ and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer