NCZ vs. SAMBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Convertible and Income Fund II (NCZ) and Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX).
NCZ is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Jul 31, 2003. SAMBX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Feb 28, 2006.
Performance
NCZ vs. SAMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NCZ vs. SAMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCZ Virtus Convertible and Income Fund II | -0.21% | 23.23% | 18.40% | 17.75% | -35.93% | 9.24% | 11.04% | 27.19% | -18.66% | 24.89% |
SAMBX Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund | -0.19% | 5.88% | 7.03% | 11.21% | -0.86% | 4.86% | 0.41% | 6.66% | 0.24% | 3.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCZ achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than SAMBX's -0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, NCZ has outperformed SAMBX with an annualized return of 8.23%, while SAMBX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.74% annualized return.
NCZ
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -8.11%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
SAMBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.95%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- 4.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NCZ vs. SAMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCZ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SAMBX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NCZ vs. SAMBX — Risk / Return Rank
NCZ
SAMBX
NCZ vs. SAMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Convertible and Income Fund II (NCZ) and Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NCZ | SAMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 2.10 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 3.61 | -1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.70 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 2.54 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | 11.64 | -1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NCZ | SAMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 2.10 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 1.78 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 1.21 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 1.17 | -0.97 |
Correlation
The correlation between NCZ and SAMBX is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NCZ vs. SAMBX - Dividend Comparison
NCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.74%, more than SAMBX's 7.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCZ Virtus Convertible and Income Fund II | 10.74% | 10.45% | 11.50% | 12.84% | 15.62% | 8.82% | 9.28% | 11.28% | 15.33% | 13.80% | 12.08% | 18.02% |
SAMBX Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund | 7.07% | 7.78% | 8.21% | 8.21% | 5.34% | 3.03% | 4.03% | 5.28% | 5.15% | 4.28% | 4.79% | 4.91% |
Drawdowns
NCZ vs. SAMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCZ drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, which is greater than SAMBX's maximum drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCZ and SAMBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCZ | SAMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.48% | -24.74% | -54.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -2.22% | -9.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.93% | -5.66% | -38.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.08% | -20.91% | -35.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.16% | -0.32% | -8.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.45% | -1.60% | -12.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 0.51% | +2.39% |
Volatility
NCZ vs. SAMBX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Convertible and Income Fund II (NCZ) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) at 0.69%. This indicates that NCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NCZ | SAMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 0.69% | +7.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 1.77% | +10.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 2.92% | +15.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 2.92% | +18.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.20% | 3.93% | +20.27% |