PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCPB vs. SMTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NCPB vs. SMTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) and ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NCPB vs. SMTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NCPB
Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF
-0.18%7.69%3.55%
SMTH
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
-0.18%6.86%2.94%

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with NCPB at -0.18% and SMTH at -0.18%.


NCPB

1D
0.47%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
1.18%
1Y
4.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMTH

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
0.56%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NCPB vs. SMTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCPB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SMTH's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NCPB vs. SMTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCPB
NCPB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
NCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SMTH
SMTH Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SMTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMTH Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SMTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMTH Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCPB vs. SMTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) and ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCPBSMTHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

0.93

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

1.34

+0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.16

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.56

+0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.98

4.70

+1.28

NCPB vs. SMTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the SMTH Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCPB and SMTH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCPBSMTHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.93

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.22

1.22

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between NCPB and SMTH is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NCPB vs. SMTH - Dividend Comparison

NCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than SMTH's 4.42% yield.


TTM202520242023
NCPB
Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF
5.22%5.21%5.14%0.00%
SMTH
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
4.42%4.46%4.58%0.24%

Drawdowns

NCPB vs. SMTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCPB drawdown since its inception was -3.59%, smaller than the maximum SMTH drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCPB and SMTH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NCPBSMTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.59%

-4.11%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

-2.74%

-0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-1.92%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-1.02%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.91%

-0.05%

Volatility

NCPB vs. SMTH - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) at 1.59%. This indicates that NCPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NCPBSMTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

1.59%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.39%

2.49%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18%

4.31%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

4.64%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.39%

4.64%

-0.25%