PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCPB vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCPB vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCPB achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly higher than BND's -0.54% return.


NCPB

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.18%
6M
-0.60%
YTD
-0.20%
1Y
3.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.55%

BND

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.20%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
-0.54%
1Y
1.75%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
-0.42%
10Y*
1.36%
ALL TIME*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$451.00M$507.49M$592.68M
$196.93K$120.32K$161.77K

NCPB vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NCPB
Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF
-0.20%7.69%3.53%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.54%7.08%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between NCPB and BND is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2024

0.96

The correlation between NCPB and BND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCPB vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NCPB
NCPB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
NCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
NCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NCPB vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NCPBBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.12

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

0.99

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.66

2.48

+1.19

NCPB vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCPB and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NCPB vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCPB drawdown since its inception was -3.59%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCPB and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCPBBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.59%

-18.58%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

-2.68%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-3.15%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.95%

-3.06%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

1.07%

-0.04%

Volatility

NCPB vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) is 0.93%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 0.98%. This indicates that NCPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCPBBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.98%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

2.90%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.50%

3.70%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.29%

6.03%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.29%

5.53%

-1.24%

NCPB vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCPB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCPB vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

NCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than BND's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.69%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
NCPB
Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF
4.88%5.21%5.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, NCPB and BND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BND has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to NCPB (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCPB dropped -3.59% vs BND's -18.58%.

On 1-year performance, NCPB leads with 3.10% vs 1.75% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NCPB has performed better with a 3.10% return vs 1.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NCPB.

NCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 3.69% for BND.

NCPB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BND is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NCPB and 0.03% for BND.

NCPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCPB and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer