NCPB vs. NUMV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NCPB (Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF) and NUMV (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NCPB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Nuveen, while NUMV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. NCPB is actively managed, while NUMV is passively managed. Over the past year, NCPB returned 6.20% vs 23.74% for NUMV. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NCPB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for NUMV.

Performance

NCPB vs. NUMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCPB achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than NUMV's 9.74% return.

NCPB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 0.53%
• 1Y: 6.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NUMV

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: 9.74%
• 6M: 11.20%
• 1Y: 23.74%
• 3Y*: 16.96%
• 5Y*: 6.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCPB vs. NUMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NCPB Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF	0.47%	7.69%	3.55%
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF	9.74%	14.05%	8.39%

Correlation

The correlation between NCPB and NUMV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.36

Return for Risk

NCPB vs. NUMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCPB

NCPB Risk / Return Rank: 49
NCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
NCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
NCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 53
NCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
NCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 43

NUMV

NUMV Risk / Return Rank: 56
NUMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
NUMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
NUMV Omega Ratio Rank: 53
NUMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
NUMV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCPB vs. NUMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NCPB	NUMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.92	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	2.79	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	2.74	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.87	10.37	-3.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NCPB vs. NUMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the NUMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCPB and NUMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NCPB	NUMV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	1.92	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	0.45	+0.76

Drawdowns

NCPB vs. NUMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCPB drawdown since its inception was -3.59%, smaller than the maximum NUMV drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCPB and NUMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCPB	NUMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.59%	-43.46%	+39.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.88%	-8.71%	+5.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-0.42%	-0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.92%	-6.89%	+5.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	2.29%	-1.39%

Volatility

NCPB vs. NUMV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) is 1.25%, while Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that NCPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCPB	NUMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	2.97%	-1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.63%	9.14%	-6.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.55%	12.49%	-8.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.34%	17.39%	-13.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.34%	19.77%	-15.43%

NCPB vs. NUMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCPB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMV's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

NCPB vs. NUMV - Dividend Comparison

NCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than NUMV's 1.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NCPB Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF	5.22%	5.21%	5.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF	1.40%	1.53%	1.81%	2.20%	5.78%	6.62%	1.38%	2.40%	4.01%	0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCPB and NUMV in my portfolio?

NCPB and NUMV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NCPB or NUMV?

NUMV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to NCPB (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCPB dropped -3.59% vs NUMV's -43.46%.

Which ETF is better, NCPB or NUMV?

On 1-year performance, NUMV leads with 23.74% vs 6.20% for NCPB. On fees, NCPB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, NCPB has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NCPB or NUMV?

Over the 1-year period, NUMV has performed better with a 23.74% return vs 6.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NCPB or NUMV?

NCPB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for NUMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NCPB or NUMV?

NCPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 1.40% for NUMV.

What is the main difference between NCPB and NUMV?

NCPB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while NUMV is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NCPB and 0.31% for NUMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NUMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.