NCPB vs. NUMG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG).

NCPB and NUMG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NCPB is an actively managed fund by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 5, 2024. NUMG is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth. It was launched on Dec 13, 2016.

Performance

NCPB vs. NUMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NCPB vs. NUMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NCPB Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF	-0.18%	7.69%	3.55%
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF	-13.96%	0.78%	8.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCPB achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly higher than NUMG's -13.96% return.

NCPB

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -2.00%
• YTD: -0.18%
• 6M: 1.18%
• 1Y: 4.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NUMG

• 1D: 3.29%
• 1M: -6.68%
• YTD: -13.96%
• 6M: -15.60%
• 1Y: -4.28%
• 3Y*: 2.51%
• 5Y*: -1.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCPB vs. NUMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NCPB and NUMG have an expense ratio of 0.30%.

NCPB

Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF

NUMG

Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF

Return for Risk

NCPB vs. NUMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCPB

NCPB Risk / Return Rank: 62
NCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
NCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
NCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 57
NCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
NCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 59

NUMG

NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 8
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCPB vs. NUMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NCPB	NUMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	-0.18	+1.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	-0.10	+1.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.99	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	-0.21	+2.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.98	-0.65	+6.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NCPB vs. NUMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the NUMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCPB and NUMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NCPB	NUMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	-0.18	+1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.22	0.37	+0.85

Correlation

The correlation between NCPB and NUMG is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NCPB vs. NUMG - Dividend Comparison

NCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than NUMG's 0.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NCPB Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF	5.22%	5.21%	5.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.06%	0.18%	0.18%	12.76%	3.82%	0.27%	5.14%	0.56%

Drawdowns

NCPB vs. NUMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCPB drawdown since its inception was -3.59%, smaller than the maximum NUMG drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCPB and NUMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCPB	NUMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.59%	-38.85%	+35.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.88%	-19.71%	+16.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-21.68%	+19.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-11.30%	+10.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	6.47%	-5.61%

Volatility

NCPB vs. NUMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) is 1.70%, while Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that NCPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCPB	NUMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.70%	6.83%	-5.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.39%	14.15%	-11.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.18%	23.42%	-19.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.39%	22.83%	-18.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.39%	21.92%	-17.53%