NCPB vs. NUBD
NCPB (Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF) and NUBD (Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NCPB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Nuveen, while NUBD is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Select Index. NCPB is actively managed, while NUBD is passively managed. Over the past year, NCPB returned 6.20% vs 4.97% for NUBD. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NCPB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for NUBD.
Performance
NCPB vs. NUBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCPB achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than NUBD's 0.20% return.
NCPB
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUBD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- -0.06%
- 10Y*
- —
NCPB vs. NUBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NCPB Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.47% | 7.69% | 3.55% |
NUBD Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.20% | 6.75% | 2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between NCPB and NUBD is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between NCPB and NUBD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NCPB vs. NUBD — Risk / Return Rank
NCPB
NUBD
NCPB vs. NUBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) and Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NCPB | NUBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.23 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 1.81 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.87 | 5.38 | +1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NCPB | NUBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 1.32 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.29 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
NCPB vs. NUBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCPB drawdown since its inception was -3.59%, smaller than the maximum NUBD drawdown of -19.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCPB and NUBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCPB | NUBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -19.45% | +15.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -2.76% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -3.93% | +2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -6.05% | +5.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.93% | -0.03% |
Volatility
NCPB vs. NUBD - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) and Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) have volatilities of 1.25% and 1.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NCPB | NUBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 1.23% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | 2.61% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.55% | 3.79% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.34% | 5.99% | -1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.34% | 5.12% | -0.78% |
NCPB vs. NUBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCPB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NUBD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
NCPB vs. NUBD - Dividend Comparison
NCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than NUBD's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCPB Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF | 5.22% | 5.21% | 5.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUBD Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.99% | 3.90% | 3.51% | 2.99% | 2.83% | 2.05% | 2.21% | 2.66% | 3.08% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, NCPB and NUBD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NCPB has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to NUBD (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCPB dropped -3.59% vs NUBD's -19.45%.
On 1-year performance, NCPB leads with 6.20% vs 4.97% for NUBD. On fees, NUBD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NCPB has performed better with a 6.20% return vs 4.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUBD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NCPB.
NCPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 3.99% for NUBD.
NCPB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while NUBD is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NCPB and 0.15% for NUBD.
NCPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NCPB and NUBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer