PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCLP.L vs. URNP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCLP.L vs. URNP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L) and HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCLP.L achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than URNP.L's 7.33% return.


NCLP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.48%
YTD
10.42%
6M
7.15%
1Y
47.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

URNP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.18%
YTD
7.33%
6M
5.19%
1Y
34.63%
3Y*
23.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCLP.L vs. URNP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NCLP.L and URNP.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025

0.90

The correlation between NCLP.L and URNP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCLP.L vs. URNP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCLP.L
NCLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NCLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

URNP.L
URNP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
URNP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
URNP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCLP.L vs. URNP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L) and HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NCLP.LURNP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.16

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

1.13

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.50

2.69

-0.20

NCLP.L vs. URNP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the URNP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCLP.L and URNP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NCLP.L vs. URNP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCLP.L drawdown since its inception was -39.10%, smaller than the maximum URNP.L drawdown of -51.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLP.L and URNP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCLP.LURNP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.10%

-51.01%

+11.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.10%

-30.89%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.24%

-25.59%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.72%

-17.96%

+3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.83%

12.90%

+5.93%

Volatility

NCLP.L vs. URNP.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L) and HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L) have volatilities of 13.00% and 13.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCLP.LURNP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.00%

13.00%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.56%

31.90%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.44%

45.17%

+18.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.45%

40.03%

+22.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.45%

40.03%

+22.42%

NCLP.L vs. URNP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCLP.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than URNP.L's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCLP.L vs. URNP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NCLP.L nor URNP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, NCLP.L and URNP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, NCLP.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NCLP.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNP.L.

NCLP.L tracks WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS Index, while URNP.L tracks S&P Global Natural Resources TR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for NCLP.L and 0.85% for URNP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCLP.L and URNP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer