PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCLO vs. NULV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NCLO vs. NULV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NCLO vs. NULV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NCLO
Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF
0.33%6.28%0.35%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.78%16.31%-3.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCLO achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than NULV's 1.78% return.


NCLO

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
0.33%
6M
2.03%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NULV

1D
0.77%
1M
-4.14%
YTD
1.78%
6M
6.21%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NCLO vs. NULV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NCLO and NULV have an expense ratio of 0.26%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NCLO vs. NULV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCLO
NCLO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

NULV
NULV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCLO vs. NULV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCLONULVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

1.02

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

1.47

+0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.21

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

1.33

+0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.65

5.95

+4.70

NCLO vs. NULV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the NULV Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCLO and NULV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCLONULVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.02

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

0.54

+0.90

Correlation

The correlation between NCLO and NULV is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NCLO vs. NULV - Dividend Comparison

NCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, more than NULV's 1.61% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCLO
Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF
5.91%6.09%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.61%1.64%2.09%2.55%2.12%4.52%1.42%1.47%3.73%1.22%

Drawdowns

NCLO vs. NULV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCLO drawdown since its inception was -3.05%, smaller than the maximum NULV drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLO and NULV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NCLONULVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-36.99%

+33.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-11.32%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-4.62%

+4.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-5.05%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

2.54%

-2.02%

Volatility

NCLO vs. NULV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) is 2.98%, while Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that NCLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NULV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NCLONULVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

4.22%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.29%

8.15%

-4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.23%

14.89%

-10.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.76%

14.31%

-10.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.76%

17.11%

-13.35%