PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCLO vs. CLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NCLO vs. CLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) and Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NCLO vs. CLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NCLO
Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF
0.37%6.28%0.35%
CLOX
Panagram AAA CLO ETF
1.01%5.52%0.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCLO achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than CLOX's 1.01% return.


NCLO

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
0.37%
6M
2.12%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLOX

1D
0.02%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.01%
6M
2.48%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NCLO vs. CLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCLO has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOX's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NCLO vs. CLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCLO
NCLO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOX
CLOX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCLO vs. CLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) and Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCLOCLOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

1.04

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.73

1.30

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.51

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.36

+0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.07

15.61

-4.54

NCLO vs. CLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the CLOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCLO and CLOX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCLOCLOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.04

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

1.93

-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between NCLO and CLOX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NCLO vs. CLOX - Dividend Comparison

NCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than CLOX's 5.00% yield.


TTM202520242023
NCLO
Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF
5.99%6.09%0.35%0.00%
CLOX
Panagram AAA CLO ETF
5.00%5.18%6.25%2.90%

Drawdowns

NCLO vs. CLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCLO drawdown since its inception was -3.05%, smaller than the maximum CLOX drawdown of -4.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLO and CLOX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NCLOCLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-4.13%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-4.02%

+0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-0.09%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

0.35%

+0.17%

Volatility

NCLO vs. CLOX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) at 0.63%. This indicates that NCLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NCLOCLOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

0.63%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.29%

0.90%

+2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.23%

5.22%

-0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.77%

3.42%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.77%

3.42%

+0.35%