PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCLEX vs. JGMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCLEX vs. JGMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCLEX achieves a -7.66% return, which is significantly lower than JGMNX's 11.51% return. Over the past 10 years, NCLEX has underperformed JGMNX with an annualized return of 7.10%, while JGMNX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.37% annualized return.


NCLEX

1D
-1.56%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
-7.66%
6M
-9.13%
1Y
-13.51%
3Y*
0.34%
5Y*
-1.40%
10Y*
7.10%

JGMNX

1D
0.03%
1M
1.06%
YTD
11.51%
6M
10.31%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCLEX vs. JGMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCLEX
Nicholas Limited Edition Fund
-7.66%-10.41%11.91%17.17%-23.71%19.07%22.67%27.36%-0.94%19.93%
JGMNX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N
11.51%9.78%10.55%14.83%-23.56%6.88%28.75%28.60%-5.03%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NCLEX and JGMNX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2012

0.93

The correlation between NCLEX and JGMNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCLEX vs. JGMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCLEX
NCLEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NCLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NCLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

JGMNX
JGMNX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JGMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
JGMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCLEX vs. JGMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCLEXJGMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.27

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

2.33

-2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

9.62

-10.92

NCLEX vs. JGMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCLEX Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the JGMNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCLEX and JGMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCLEXJGMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.79

1.60

-2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.22

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.51

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.59

-0.08

Drawdowns

NCLEX vs. JGMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCLEX drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, which is greater than JGMNX's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLEX and JGMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCLEXJGMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.68%

-39.72%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.36%

-11.03%

-10.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.50%

-23.84%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.50%

-31.74%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.79%

-39.72%

+3.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.75%

-0.98%

-21.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-7.13%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.24%

2.67%

+7.57%

Volatility

NCLEX vs. JGMNX - Volatility Comparison

Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX) have volatilities of 5.36% and 5.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCLEXJGMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

5.21%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

12.37%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.95%

16.08%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.53%

19.59%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

20.58%

-1.37%

NCLEX vs. JGMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCLEX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JGMNX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCLEX vs. JGMNX - Dividend Comparison

NCLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.16%, less than JGMNX's 9.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGMNX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N
9.74%10.86%7.35%6.96%6.10%19.99%4.06%4.20%7.41%5.03%2.96%7.71%
NCLEX
Nicholas Limited Edition Fund
8.16%7.53%2.51%2.43%6.22%16.44%5.10%5.66%10.72%7.97%10.68%8.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCLEX and JGMNX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NCLEX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to JGMNX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCLEX dropped -48.68% vs JGMNX's -39.72%.

JGMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCLEX and JGMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer