PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCIQ vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCIQ vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCIQ achieves a -30.25% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 27.41% return.


NCIQ

1D
-2.79%
1M
-21.86%
YTD
-30.25%
6M
-34.70%
1Y
-41.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITI

1D
2.70%
1M
27.75%
YTD
27.41%
6M
34.37%
1Y
47.79%
3Y*
-34.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCIQ vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NCIQ
Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF
-30.25%-10.21%
BITI
ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF
27.41%2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NCIQ and BITI is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2025

-0.99

The correlation between NCIQ and BITI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCIQ vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCIQ
NCIQ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
NCIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
NCIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCIQ vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCIQBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.20

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

1.90

-2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

4.06

-5.38

NCIQ vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCIQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCIQ and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCIQBITIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.87

1.10

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.64

-0.71

+0.08

Drawdowns

NCIQ vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCIQ drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCIQ and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCIQBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.35%

-92.16%

+38.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.35%

-25.28%

-28.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.35%

-86.09%

+32.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.95%

-67.97%

+46.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.13%

11.80%

+19.33%

Volatility

NCIQ vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI) have volatilities of 9.32% and 8.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCIQBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.32%

8.92%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.88%

33.40%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.24%

43.55%

+3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.79%

52.50%

-4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.79%

52.50%

-4.71%

NCIQ vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCIQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCIQ vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

NCIQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.27%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF
9.27%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
NCIQ
Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCIQ and BITI have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NCIQ has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to BITI (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCIQ dropped -53.35% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 47.79% vs -41.02% for NCIQ. On fees, NCIQ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 8.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 47.79% return vs -41.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NCIQ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 9.27%, compared with 0.00% for NCIQ.

NCIQ tracks Nasdaq Crypto US Settlement Price™ Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Hashdex and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NCIQ and 1.03% for BITI.

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCIQ and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer