NCHRX vs. NSBRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NCHRX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX).
NCHRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 27, 2006. NSBRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 28, 2006.
Performance
NCHRX vs. NSBRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NCHRX vs. NSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCHRX Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | -0.26% | 3.34% | 5.17% | 4.46% | -20.76% | 5.41% | 6.02% | 12.21% | -0.33% | 11.27% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | -2.40% | 10.03% | 17.56% | 15.08% | -9.63% | 27.17% | 9.79% | 41.88% | -4.36% | 20.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCHRX achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly higher than NSBRX's -2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, NCHRX has underperformed NSBRX with an annualized return of 1.93%, while NSBRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.
NCHRX
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.20%
- 5Y*
- -1.21%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
NSBRX
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- 1Y
- 8.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NCHRX vs. NSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCHRX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than NSBRX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NCHRX vs. NSBRX — Risk / Return Rank
NCHRX
NSBRX
NCHRX vs. NSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NCHRX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NCHRX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 0.61 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.65 | 0.97 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.14 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 0.82 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.45 | 3.53 | -2.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NCHRX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 0.61 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.66 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.75 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.58 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between NCHRX and NSBRX is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
NCHRX vs. NSBRX - Dividend Comparison
NCHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than NSBRX's 9.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCHRX Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 4.66% | 4.59% | 4.28% | 4.40% | 5.14% | 3.90% | 3.85% | 4.17% | 4.08% | 3.94% | 4.42% | 4.45% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 9.19% | 9.26% | 6.82% | 3.01% | 3.58% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 15.68% | 7.04% | 4.57% | 1.75% | 6.24% |
Drawdowns
NCHRX vs. NSBRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCHRX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, smaller than the maximum NSBRX drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCHRX and NSBRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCHRX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.64% | -45.14% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.05% | -10.75% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.27% | -19.79% | -8.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.27% | -33.69% | +5.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.34% | -6.10% | -4.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -5.28% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 2.50% | +0.72% |
Volatility
NCHRX vs. NSBRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NCHRX) is 1.82%, while Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that NCHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NCHRX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.82% | 4.11% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | 7.73% | -5.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.76% | 15.14% | -7.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.97% | 14.29% | -7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.46% | 16.59% | -9.13% |