NCA vs. NVLIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund (NCA) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX).
NCA is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Oct 7, 1987. NVLIX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on May 15, 2009.
Performance
NCA vs. NVLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NCA vs. NVLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCA Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund | 6.59% | 10.27% | -1.92% | 10.39% | -13.57% | -3.51% | 4.62% | 21.08% | -7.38% | 2.94% |
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | -11.60% | 12.76% | 29.48% | 43.60% | -31.31% | 27.62% | 37.97% | 33.54% | 3.02% | 33.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCA achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly higher than NVLIX's -11.60% return. Over the past 10 years, NCA has underperformed NVLIX with an annualized return of 2.28%, while NVLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.48% annualized return.
NCA
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 13.65%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.28%
NVLIX
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- -6.71%
- YTD
- -11.60%
- 6M
- -11.36%
- 1Y
- 9.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NCA vs. NVLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than NVLIX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NCA vs. NVLIX — Risk / Return Rank
NCA
NVLIX
NCA vs. NVLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund (NCA) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NCA | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.47 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 0.84 | +0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.12 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 0.39 | +1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 1.29 | +4.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NCA | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.47 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.43 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.71 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.74 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between NCA and NVLIX is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NCA vs. NVLIX - Dividend Comparison
NCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than NVLIX's 25.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCA Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund | 3.69% | 3.89% | 4.12% | 3.88% | 3.66% | 3.02% | 2.98% | 3.21% | 3.79% | 5.33% | 4.36% | 4.34% |
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | 25.40% | 22.45% | 14.35% | 5.39% | 8.93% | 9.51% | 5.47% | 8.69% | 18.81% | 18.70% | 17.11% | 15.18% |
Drawdowns
NCA vs. NVLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCA drawdown since its inception was -37.14%, smaller than the maximum NVLIX drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCA and NVLIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCA | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.14% | -39.57% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -19.01% | +11.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.97% | -39.57% | +16.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.97% | -39.57% | +16.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.06% | -16.03% | +13.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.12% | -6.20% | -1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 5.80% | -3.37% |
Volatility
NCA vs. NVLIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund (NCA) is 6.34%, while Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that NCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NCA | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 6.85% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 12.64% | -2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.67% | 22.89% | -10.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.09% | 22.40% | -10.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.38% | 21.99% | -9.61% |