PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBXG vs. AI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBXG vs. AI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG) and C3.ai, Inc. (AI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBXG achieves a 20.11% return, which is significantly higher than AI's -21.51% return.


NBXG

1D
0.06%
1M
10.98%
YTD
20.11%
6M
17.22%
1Y
34.00%
3Y*
29.33%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*

AI

1D
-1.21%
1M
12.43%
YTD
-21.51%
6M
-30.94%
1Y
-59.71%
3Y*
-33.09%
5Y*
-30.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBXG vs. AI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NBXG
Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund
20.11%24.23%28.53%34.92%-41.41%-10.72%
AI
C3.ai, Inc.
-21.51%-60.85%19.92%156.57%-64.19%-49.13%

Correlation

The correlation between NBXG and AI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021

0.56

The correlation between NBXG and AI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBXG vs. AI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBXG
NBXG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NBXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBXG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
NBXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBXG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AI
AI Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
AI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AI Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
AI Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
AI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
AI Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBXG vs. AI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG) and C3.ai, Inc. (AI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBXGAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.83

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

-0.82

+2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.32

-1.17

+7.49

NBXG vs. AI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the AI Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBXG and AI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBXGAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

-0.92

+2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

-0.39

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.40

+0.64

Drawdowns

NBXG vs. AI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBXG drawdown since its inception was -51.76%, smaller than the maximum AI drawdown of -95.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBXG and AI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBXGAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.76%

-95.63%

+43.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-73.39%

+57.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.08%

-83.27%

+61.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.76%

-88.32%

+36.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-94.04%

+92.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.08%

-81.93%

+60.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.39%

51.07%

-45.68%

Volatility

NBXG vs. AI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG) is 5.85%, while C3.ai, Inc. (AI) has a volatility of 19.04%. This indicates that NBXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBXGAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

19.04%

-13.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.02%

48.00%

-32.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.85%

65.18%

-46.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.07%

77.73%

-51.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.01%

82.17%

-56.16%

Dividends

NBXG vs. AI - Dividend Comparison

NBXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, while AI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AI
C3.ai, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NBXG
Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund
8.18%8.73%9.42%10.98%13.19%3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBXG and AI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AI has higher volatility (19.04%) compared to NBXG (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBXG dropped -51.76% vs AI's -95.63%.

NBXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBXG and AI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer