NBXG vs. AI
NBXG (Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while AI (C3.ai, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, NBXG returned 6.19%/yr vs -30.32%/yr for AI. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
NBXG vs. AI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBXG achieves a 20.11% return, which is significantly higher than AI's -21.51% return.
NBXG
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 10.98%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 17.22%
- 1Y
- 34.00%
- 3Y*
- 29.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- —
AI
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 12.43%
- YTD
- -21.51%
- 6M
- -30.94%
- 1Y
- -59.71%
- 3Y*
- -33.09%
- 5Y*
- -30.32%
- 10Y*
- —
NBXG vs. AI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBXG Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund | 20.11% | 24.23% | 28.53% | 34.92% | -41.41% | -10.72% |
AI C3.ai, Inc. | -21.51% | -60.85% | 19.92% | 156.57% | -64.19% | -49.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBXG and AI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.56 |
The correlation between NBXG and AI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBXG vs. AI — Risk / Return Rank
NBXG
AI
NBXG vs. AI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG) and C3.ai, Inc. (AI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBXG | AI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.83 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | -0.82 | +2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.32 | -1.17 | +7.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBXG | AI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | -0.92 | +2.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | -0.39 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | -0.40 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
NBXG vs. AI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBXG drawdown since its inception was -51.76%, smaller than the maximum AI drawdown of -95.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBXG and AI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBXG | AI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.76% | -95.63% | +43.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.26% | -73.39% | +57.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.08% | -83.27% | +61.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.76% | -88.32% | +36.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -94.04% | +92.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.08% | -81.93% | +60.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.39% | 51.07% | -45.68% |
Volatility
NBXG vs. AI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG) is 5.85%, while C3.ai, Inc. (AI) has a volatility of 19.04%. This indicates that NBXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBXG | AI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 19.04% | -13.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.02% | 48.00% | -32.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 65.18% | -46.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.07% | 77.73% | -51.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.01% | 82.17% | -56.16% |
Dividends
NBXG vs. AI - Dividend Comparison
NBXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, while AI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AI C3.ai, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NBXG Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund | 8.18% | 8.73% | 9.42% | 10.98% | 13.19% | 3.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBXG and AI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AI has higher volatility (19.04%) compared to NBXG (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBXG dropped -51.76% vs AI's -95.63%.
NBXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBXG and AI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer