NBSSX vs. YFSIX
NBSSX (Neuberger Berman Focus Fund) and YFSIX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, NBSSX returned 6.02%/yr vs 9.02%/yr for YFSIX. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NBSSX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YFSIX.
Performance
NBSSX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBSSX achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 24.97% return.
NBSSX
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- 6M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.98%
YFSIX
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- YTD
- 24.97%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.02%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NBSSX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBSSX Neuberger Berman Focus Fund | 4.74% | 21.36% | 21.64% | 23.73% | -31.74% | 19.85% | 24.45% | 28.50% | -9.02% | 15.46% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 24.97% | 14.91% | -0.34% | 16.64% | -9.15% | 13.13% | 18.46% | 24.40% | 2.18% | 20.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBSSX and YFSIX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between NBSSX and YFSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBSSX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank
NBSSX
YFSIX
NBSSX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBSSX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.22 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 1.41 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.86 | 4.10 | -1.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBSSX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBSSX drawdown since its inception was -61.56%, which is greater than YFSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSSX and YFSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBSSX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.56% | -35.10% | -26.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.61% | -14.20% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.39% | -14.20% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.77% | -25.14% | -15.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.90% | -2.55% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.99% | -4.89% | -8.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 4.86% | -1.44% |
Volatility
NBSSX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) have volatilities of 5.82% and 5.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBSSX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 5.69% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 15.90% | -2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.58% | 22.66% | -7.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 15.78% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 16.36% | +2.88% |
NBSSX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBSSX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBSSX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison
NBSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.34%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBSSX Neuberger Berman Focus Fund | 9.34% | 9.78% | 0.19% | 0.59% | 0.05% | 19.35% | 5.37% | 12.78% | 9.08% | 8.32% | 9.59% | 5.18% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.68% | 8.02% | 4.32% | 8.18% | 4.76% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBSSX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBSSX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to YFSIX (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBSSX dropped -61.56% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.
YFSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBSSX and YFSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer