PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBSSX vs. VTWAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBSSX vs. VTWAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBSSX achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly lower than VTWAX's 12.65% return.


NBSSX

1D
0.39%
1M
3.58%
YTD
7.63%
6M
8.79%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
11.26%

VTWAX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.31%
YTD
12.65%
6M
13.20%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBSSX vs. VTWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NBSSX
Neuberger Berman Focus Fund
7.63%21.36%21.64%23.73%-31.74%19.85%24.45%18.23%
VTWAX
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
12.65%22.43%16.43%21.85%-18.02%18.17%16.67%17.53%

Correlation

The correlation between NBSSX and VTWAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019

0.92

The correlation between NBSSX and VTWAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBSSX vs. VTWAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBSSX
NBSSX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
NBSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWAX
VTWAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VTWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBSSX vs. VTWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBSSXVTWAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

3.06

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.04

13.70

-6.66

NBSSX vs. VTWAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the VTWAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBSSX and VTWAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBSSXVTWAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.39

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.71

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.77

-0.38

Drawdowns

NBSSX vs. VTWAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBSSX drawdown since its inception was -61.56%, which is greater than VTWAX's maximum drawdown of -34.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSSX and VTWAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBSSXVTWAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.56%

-34.20%

-27.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-9.64%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.39%

-16.43%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.77%

-26.40%

-14.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.44%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.02%

-5.30%

-7.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

2.15%

+1.03%

Volatility

NBSSX vs. VTWAX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX) at 3.56%. This indicates that NBSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTWAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBSSXVTWAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

3.56%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

9.84%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.65%

12.39%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.87%

15.71%

+3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

18.19%

+0.99%

NBSSX vs. VTWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBSSX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWAX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBSSX vs. VTWAX - Dividend Comparison

NBSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.09%, more than VTWAX's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBSSX
Neuberger Berman Focus Fund
9.09%9.78%0.19%0.59%0.05%19.35%5.37%12.78%9.08%8.32%9.59%5.18%
VTWAX
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.56%1.80%1.92%2.06%2.17%1.79%1.64%2.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBSSX and VTWAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBSSX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to VTWAX (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBSSX dropped -61.56% vs VTWAX's -34.20%.

VTWAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBSSX and VTWAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer