NBSD vs. JSI
NBSD (Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF) and JSI (Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NBSD returned 4.72% vs 4.72% for JSI. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NBSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for JSI.
Performance
NBSD vs. JSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBSD achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than JSI's 0.99% return.
NBSD
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JSI
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBSD vs. JSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NBSD Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF | 0.83% | 6.18% | 3.97% |
JSI Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF | 0.99% | 6.46% | 3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBSD and JSI is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024 | 0.47 |
The correlation between NBSD and JSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBSD vs. JSI — Risk / Return Rank
NBSD
JSI
NBSD vs. JSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF (NBSD) and Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBSD | JSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 1.41 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 2.82 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.74 | 9.18 | +11.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBSD | JSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | 1.99 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.05 | 2.49 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
NBSD vs. JSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBSD drawdown since its inception was -2.63%, which is greater than JSI's maximum drawdown of -2.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSD and JSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBSD | JSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.63% | -2.31% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.19% | -1.68% | +0.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.46% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -0.34% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 0.52% | -0.29% |
Volatility
NBSD vs. JSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF (NBSD) is 0.35%, while Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) has a volatility of 0.66%. This indicates that NBSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBSD | JSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | 0.66% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.01% | 1.53% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47% | 2.38% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 2.88% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 2.88% | -0.10% |
NBSD vs. JSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JSI's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBSD vs. JSI - Dividend Comparison
NBSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, less than JSI's 5.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JSI Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF | 5.80% | 5.80% | 6.16% | 0.84% |
NBSD Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF | 4.81% | 5.06% | 2.96% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBSD and JSI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSI has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to NBSD (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBSD dropped -2.63% vs JSI's -2.31%.
On 1-year performance, JSI leads with 4.72% vs 4.72% for NBSD. On fees, NBSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NBSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JSI has performed better with a 4.72% return vs 4.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NBSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for JSI.
JSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.80%, compared with 4.81% for NBSD.
They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NBSD and 0.50% for JSI.
NBSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBSD and JSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer