PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBRFX vs. VRTPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBRFX vs. VRTPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBRFX achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly higher than VRTPX's 8.00% return.


NBRFX

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
11.20%
6M
10.13%
1Y
9.22%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
2.44%
10Y*
6.43%

VRTPX

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
8.00%
6M
6.94%
1Y
10.19%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
2.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBRFX vs. VRTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBRFX
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund
11.20%-2.14%5.02%11.70%-27.35%47.87%-1.34%31.06%-5.31%3.90%
VRTPX
Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund
8.00%2.22%3.72%13.17%-26.14%40.37%-4.65%28.96%-5.99%1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between NBRFX and VRTPX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017

0.97

The correlation between NBRFX and VRTPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBRFX vs. VRTPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBRFX
NBRFX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
NBRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NBRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTPX
VRTPX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
VRTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBRFX vs. VRTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBRFXVRTPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.14

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.20

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.05

3.78

-0.73

NBRFX vs. VRTPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBRFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the VRTPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBRFX and VRTPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBRFXVRTPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.76

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.11

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.25

+0.07

Drawdowns

NBRFX vs. VRTPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBRFX drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, which is greater than VRTPX's maximum drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBRFX and VRTPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBRFXVRTPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.52%

-42.33%

-28.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.84%

-8.34%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-18.19%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.60%

-34.35%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.27%

-4.29%

-2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.82%

-11.40%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.64%

+0.19%

Volatility

NBRFX vs. VRTPX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) have volatilities of 3.64% and 3.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBRFXVRTPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

3.79%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

9.34%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

13.15%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

18.89%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.35%

21.79%

-1.44%

NBRFX vs. VRTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBRFX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTPX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBRFX vs. VRTPX - Dividend Comparison

NBRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than VRTPX's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBRFX
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund
1.82%2.07%1.94%2.11%12.58%7.76%2.03%4.73%6.98%6.43%14.86%9.29%
VRTPX
Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund
3.61%2.79%3.80%3.93%4.52%2.58%3.92%3.50%4.77%1.32%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, NBRFX and VRTPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VRTPX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to NBRFX (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBRFX dropped -70.52% vs VRTPX's -42.33%.

VRTPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBRFX and VRTPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer