PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBRFX vs. PHRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBRFX vs. PHRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund (PHRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBRFX achieves a 14.74% return, which is significantly lower than PHRAX's 17.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NBRFX having a 6.67% annualized return and PHRAX not far behind at 6.51%.


NBRFX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.01%
YTD
14.74%
6M
14.57%
1Y
12.77%
3Y*
10.35%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
6.67%

PHRAX

1D
0.15%
1M
1.35%
YTD
17.26%
6M
16.86%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
13.05%
5Y*
4.60%
10Y*
6.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBRFX vs. PHRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBRFX
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund
14.74%-2.14%5.02%11.70%-27.35%47.87%-1.34%31.06%-5.31%11.59%
PHRAX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund
17.26%0.23%10.15%10.98%-26.33%46.79%-1.98%27.09%-7.41%5.65%

Correlation

The correlation between NBRFX and PHRAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2002

0.98

The correlation between NBRFX and PHRAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBRFX vs. PHRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBRFX
NBRFX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
NBRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
NBRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

PHRAX
PHRAX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PHRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PHRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBRFX vs. PHRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund (PHRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBRFXPHRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.20

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.98

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

5.93

-2.32

NBRFX vs. PHRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBRFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the PHRAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBRFX and PHRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBRFX vs. PHRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBRFX drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, roughly equal to the maximum PHRAX drawdown of -72.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBRFX and PHRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBRFXPHRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.52%

-72.56%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.84%

-7.83%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-19.09%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.60%

-33.51%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.56%

-42.00%

+4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

0.00%

-4.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.80%

-11.35%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.69%

+0.17%

Volatility

NBRFX vs. PHRAX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund (PHRAX) have volatilities of 5.27% and 5.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBRFXPHRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

5.29%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

10.20%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.70%

13.73%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

19.12%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.39%

21.01%

-0.62%

NBRFX vs. PHRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBRFX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than PHRAX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBRFX vs. PHRAX - Dividend Comparison

NBRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than PHRAX's 4.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBRFX
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund
1.63%2.07%1.94%2.11%12.58%7.76%2.03%4.73%6.98%6.43%14.86%9.29%
PHRAX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund
4.99%5.93%8.39%12.35%11.12%4.45%5.58%21.34%19.03%18.54%21.22%20.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, NBRFX and PHRAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PHRAX has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to NBRFX (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBRFX dropped -70.52% vs PHRAX's -72.56%.

PHRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBRFX and PHRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer