NBRFX vs. FRINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX).
NBRFX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on May 1, 2002. FRINX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 14, 2010.
Performance
NBRFX vs. FRINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NBRFX vs. FRINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBRFX Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund | 3.76% | -2.14% | 5.02% | 11.70% | -27.35% | 47.87% | -1.34% | 31.06% | -5.31% | 11.59% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 0.33% | 6.87% | 7.61% | 9.01% | -14.79% | 18.64% | -1.36% | 17.52% | -1.93% | 6.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBRFX achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly higher than FRINX's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, NBRFX has outperformed FRINX with an annualized return of 5.68%, while FRINX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.05% annualized return.
NBRFX
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -6.07%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- -0.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- 5.68%
FRINX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NBRFX vs. FRINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBRFX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FRINX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NBRFX vs. FRINX — Risk / Return Rank
NBRFX
FRINX
NBRFX vs. FRINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBRFX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | 0.91 | -0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.10 | 1.23 | -1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.18 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 1.09 | -1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.22 | 4.54 | -4.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBRFX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 0.91 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.54 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.53 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.75 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between NBRFX and FRINX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NBRFX vs. FRINX - Dividend Comparison
NBRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than FRINX's 4.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBRFX Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund | 1.95% | 2.07% | 1.94% | 2.11% | 12.58% | 7.76% | 2.03% | 4.73% | 6.98% | 6.43% | 14.86% | 9.29% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 4.38% | 4.40% | 4.41% | 4.78% | 5.80% | 1.31% | 4.53% | 5.45% | 4.89% | 4.21% | 4.77% | 3.53% |
Drawdowns
NBRFX vs. FRINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBRFX drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, which is greater than FRINX's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBRFX and FRINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBRFX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.52% | -34.50% | -36.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.34% | -4.28% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.60% | -18.30% | -17.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.56% | -34.50% | -3.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.47% | -2.72% | -10.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.85% | -3.41% | -8.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 1.03% | +2.44% |
Volatility
NBRFX vs. FRINX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX) at 1.65%. This indicates that NBRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NBRFX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 1.65% | +2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 2.87% | +6.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 4.92% | +11.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 6.51% | +13.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 9.50% | +10.84% |