NBRFX vs. CREEX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NBRFX (Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund) and CREEX (Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 10 years, NBRFX returned 6.43%/yr vs 5.95%/yr for CREEX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NBRFX charges 1.39%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for CREEX.

Performance

NBRFX vs. CREEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund (CREEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBRFX achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly lower than CREEX's 12.06% return. Over the past 10 years, NBRFX has outperformed CREEX with an annualized return of 6.43%, while CREEX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.95% annualized return.

NBRFX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: 11.20%
• 6M: 10.13%
• 1Y: 9.22%
• 3Y*: 8.47%
• 5Y*: 2.44%
• 10Y*: 6.43%

CREEX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: 12.06%
• 6M: 11.05%
• 1Y: 12.73%
• 3Y*: 9.96%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: 5.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBRFX vs. CREEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NBRFX Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund	11.20%	-2.14%	5.02%	11.70%	-27.35%	47.87%	-1.34%	31.06%	-5.31%	11.59%
CREEX Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund	12.06%	0.19%	7.40%	16.20%	-25.10%	41.91%	-3.54%	28.40%	-7.21%	4.56%

Correlation

The correlation between NBRFX and CREEX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2002	0.98

The correlation between NBRFX and CREEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NBRFX vs. CREEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBRFX

NBRFX Risk / Return Rank: 9
NBRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
NBRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
NBRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
NBRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
NBRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CREEX

CREEX Risk / Return Rank: 14
CREEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
CREEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
CREEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
CREEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
CREEX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBRFX vs. CREEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund (CREEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBRFX	CREEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	0.90	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	1.29	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.16	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	1.55	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.05	4.62	-1.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NBRFX vs. CREEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBRFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the CREEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBRFX and CREEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBRFX	CREEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66	0.90	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.25	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.29	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.39	-0.06

Drawdowns

NBRFX vs. CREEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBRFX drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, roughly equal to the maximum CREEX drawdown of -70.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBRFX and CREEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBRFX	CREEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.52%	-70.78%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.84%	-7.94%	+0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	-19.89%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.60%	-31.25%	-4.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.56%	-41.42%	+3.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.27%	-3.25%	-4.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.82%	-10.72%	-1.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	2.66%	+0.17%

Volatility

NBRFX vs. CREEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) is 3.64%, while Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund (CREEX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that NBRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CREEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBRFX	CREEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.64%	4.02%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.51%	9.48%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.05%	13.70%	-0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.78%	19.04%	+0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.35%	20.66%	-0.31%

NBRFX vs. CREEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBRFX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CREEX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBRFX vs. CREEX - Dividend Comparison

NBRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than CREEX's 5.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CREEX Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund	5.59%	6.26%	10.13%	32.32%	5.92%	6.41%	7.50%	12.02%	8.22%	14.73%	4.23%	8.59%
NBRFX Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund	1.82%	2.07%	1.94%	2.11%	12.58%	7.76%	2.03%	4.73%	6.98%	6.43%	14.86%	9.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBRFX and CREEX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, NBRFX and CREEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NBRFX or CREEX?

CREEX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to NBRFX (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBRFX dropped -70.52% vs CREEX's -70.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CREEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.