PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBOS vs. XDOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBOS vs. XDOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NBOS

1D
-0.16%
1M
2.06%
YTD
6.51%
6M
7.94%
1Y
19.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDOC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBOS vs. XDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBOS vs. XDOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBOS
NBOS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NBOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBOS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NBOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBOS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

XDOC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBOS vs. XDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBOSXDOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.25

NBOS vs. XDOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBOSXDOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

Drawdowns

NBOS vs. XDOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBOS drawdown since its inception was -12.66%, which is greater than XDOC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBOS and XDOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBOSXDOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

0.00%

-12.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.10%

0.00%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

Volatility

NBOS vs. XDOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBOSXDOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.47%

0.00%

+7.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.96%

0.00%

+9.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

0.00%

+9.96%

NBOS vs. XDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBOS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than XDOC's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBOS vs. XDOC - Dividend Comparison

NBOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.93%, while XDOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
NBOS
Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF
7.93%7.81%7.32%
XDOC
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, NBOS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NBOS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDOC.

NBOS has the higher dividend yield at 7.93%, compared with 0.00% for XDOC.

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NBOS and 0.79% for XDOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBOS and XDOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer