NBOS vs. PBAP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NBOS (Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF) and PBAP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NBOS returned 19.19% vs 13.30% for PBAP. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBOS charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBAP.

Performance

NBOS vs. PBAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NBOS having a 6.51% return and PBAP slightly higher at 6.70%.

NBOS

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: 6.51%
• 6M: 7.94%
• 1Y: 19.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBAP

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 6.70%
• 6M: 7.49%
• 1Y: 13.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBOS vs. PBAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NBOS Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF	6.51%	12.22%	7.60%
PBAP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April	6.70%	6.34%	8.88%

Correlation

The correlation between NBOS and PBAP is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	0.77

The correlation between NBOS and PBAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NBOS vs. PBAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBOS

NBOS Risk / Return Rank: 84
NBOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
NBOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
NBOS Omega Ratio Rank: 87
NBOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
NBOS Martin Ratio Rank: 92

PBAP

PBAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
PBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
PBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBOS vs. PBAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBOS	PBAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	4.29	-1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	7.35	-3.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	2.15	-0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.09	11.41	-7.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.25	82.09	-58.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NBOS vs. PBAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBOS Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is lower than the PBAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBOS and PBAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBOS	PBAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	4.29	-1.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.29	1.45	-0.15

Drawdowns

NBOS vs. PBAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBOS drawdown since its inception was -12.66%, which is greater than PBAP's maximum drawdown of -9.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBOS and PBAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBOS	PBAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.66%	-9.70%	-2.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.71%	-1.17%	-3.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.13%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.10%	-0.79%	-0.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	0.16%	+0.67%

Volatility

NBOS vs. PBAP - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP) at 0.59%. This indicates that NBOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBOS	PBAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.84%	0.59%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.90%	2.00%	+3.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.47%	3.12%	+4.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.96%	7.10%	+2.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.96%	7.10%	+2.86%

NBOS vs. PBAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBOS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than PBAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBOS vs. PBAP - Dividend Comparison

NBOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.93%, while PBAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NBOS Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF	7.93%	7.81%	7.32%
PBAP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBOS and PBAP in my portfolio?

NBOS and PBAP have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBOS or PBAP?

NBOS has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to PBAP (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBOS dropped -12.66% vs PBAP's -9.70%.

Which ETF is better, NBOS or PBAP?

On 1-year performance, NBOS leads with 19.19% vs 13.30% for PBAP. On fees, PBAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PBAP has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NBOS or PBAP?

Over the 1-year period, NBOS has performed better with a 19.19% return vs 13.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBOS or PBAP?

PBAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NBOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBOS or PBAP?

NBOS has the higher dividend yield at 7.93%, compared with 0.00% for PBAP.

What is the main difference between NBOS and PBAP?

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NBOS and 0.50% for PBAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.