NBOS vs. JULQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ).
NBOS and JULQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NBOS is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Sep 16, 2016. JULQ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jun 30, 2023.
Performance
NBOS vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NBOS vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBOS Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF | -1.58% |
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
NBOS
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 3.96%
- 1Y
- 13.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NBOS vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBOS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NBOS vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank
NBOS
JULQ
NBOS vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBOS | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.32 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBOS | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | — | — |
Dividends
NBOS vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison
NBOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, while JULQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NBOS Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF | 8.14% | 7.81% | 7.32% |
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NBOS vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBOS drawdown since its inception was -12.66%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBOS and JULQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBOS | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.66% | 0.00% | -12.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | 0.00% | -2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.17% | 0.00% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | — | — |
Volatility
NBOS vs. JULQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NBOS | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 0.00% | +11.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.24% | 0.00% | +10.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.24% | 0.00% | +10.24% |