PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBOS vs. JULQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NBOS vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NBOS vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


NBOS

1D
2.22%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
0.16%
6M
3.96%
1Y
13.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JULQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NBOS vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBOS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NBOS vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBOS
NBOS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NBOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBOS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NBOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBOS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

JULQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBOS vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBOSJULQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.32

NBOS vs. JULQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBOSJULQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

Dividends

NBOS vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison

NBOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, while JULQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

NBOS vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBOS drawdown since its inception was -12.66%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBOS and JULQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NBOSJULQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

0.00%

-12.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

0.00%

-2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.17%

0.00%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

Volatility

NBOS vs. JULQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NBOSJULQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

0.00%

+11.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.24%

0.00%

+10.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.24%

0.00%

+10.24%