PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBMIX vs. NBGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBMIX vs. NBGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBMIX achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly lower than NBGIX's 13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, NBMIX has outperformed NBGIX with an annualized return of 13.65%, while NBGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.69% annualized return.


NBMIX

1D
-0.95%
1M
-5.61%
6M
4.05%
YTD
9.72%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
13.65%
ALL TIME*
9.90%

NBGIX

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.05%
6M
6.86%
YTD
13.23%
1Y
13.51%
3Y*
6.00%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
9.69%
ALL TIME*
10.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NBMIX vs. NBGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBMIX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund
9.72%9.87%25.90%10.01%-24.43%4.16%42.83%34.55%4.80%28.16%
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
13.23%-4.55%9.20%15.73%-19.35%18.25%25.07%29.68%-6.76%16.02%

Correlation

The correlation between NBMIX and NBGIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1999

0.86

The correlation between NBMIX and NBGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBMIX vs. NBGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBMIX
NBMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NBMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
NBMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

NBGIX
NBGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
NBGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBMIX vs. NBGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBMIXNBGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.14

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.13

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

3.01

+1.23

NBMIX vs. NBGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBMIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the NBGIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBMIX and NBGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBMIX vs. NBGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBMIX drawdown since its inception was -78.77%, which is greater than NBGIX's maximum drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBMIX and NBGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBMIXNBGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.77%

-51.62%

-27.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.65%

-10.75%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.53%

-27.48%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.96%

-28.27%

-8.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.55%

-34.53%

-5.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.35%

-3.41%

-7.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.34%

-7.46%

-26.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.22%

4.02%

+1.20%

Volatility

NBMIX vs. NBGIX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX) has a higher volatility of 6.92% compared to Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) at 3.76%. This indicates that NBMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBMIXNBGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.92%

3.76%

+3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.56%

11.37%

+10.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.97%

16.31%

+10.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.26%

19.69%

+5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.61%

20.21%

+4.40%

NBMIX vs. NBGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBMIX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than NBGIX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBMIX vs. NBGIX - Dividend Comparison

NBMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, less than NBGIX's 14.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
14.49%16.41%2.14%3.13%11.11%10.91%3.87%6.00%12.49%14.10%6.53%11.28%
NBMIX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund
6.14%6.74%0.46%0.00%0.00%18.71%1.06%3.98%23.77%1.44%0.00%5.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBMIX and NBGIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBMIX has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to NBGIX (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBMIX dropped -78.77% vs NBGIX's -51.62%.

NBMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBMIX and NBGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer