PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIZ vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIZ vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NBIZ

1D
24.45%
1M
-49.56%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMST

1D
13.28%
1M
107.06%
YTD
-45.29%
6M
-28.73%
1Y
71.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIZ vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NBIZ and SMST is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIZ vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIZ

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIZ vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NBIZ vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBIZSMSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

-0.52

+0.06

Drawdowns

NBIZ vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIZ drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, roughly equal to the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIZ and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBIZSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.84%

-99.25%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.16%

-97.85%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.74%

-90.70%

+20.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.18%

Volatility

NBIZ vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBIZSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

126.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

218.90%

141.30%

+77.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

218.90%

166.75%

+52.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

218.90%

166.75%

+52.15%

NBIZ vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBIZ vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBIZ nor SMST has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIZ and SMST have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMST is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMST is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for NBIZ.

NBIZ and SMST have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for NBIZ and 1.29% for SMST.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIZ and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer