NBIZ vs. RGTU
NBIZ (Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF) and RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBIZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS), while RGTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. NBIZ is passively managed, while RGTU is actively managed. Their -0.55 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NBIZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RGTU.
Performance
NBIZ vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBIZ
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- -37.07%
- 6M
- -98.00%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RGTU
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- -36.13%
- 6M
- -62.74%
- YTD
- -76.61%
- 1Y
- -68.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -52.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $76.41M | $57.60M | $42.81M | |
| $1.69M | $1.58M | $6.01M |
NBIZ vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBIZ Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF | -97.27% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | -78.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIZ and RGTU is -0.55, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | -0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIZ vs. RGTU — Risk / Return Rank
NBIZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RGTU
NBIZ vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIZ | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIZ vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIZ drawdown since its inception was -98.41%, roughly equal to the maximum RGTU drawdown of -97.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIZ and RGTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIZ | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.41% | -97.93% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -97.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.41% | -97.39% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.23% | -66.82% | -10.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 79.64% | — |
Volatility
NBIZ vs. RGTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIZ | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 54.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 143.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 237.50% | 213.12% | +24.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 237.50% | 215.68% | +21.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 237.50% | 215.68% | +21.82% |
NBIZ vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RGTU's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIZ vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison
NBIZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NBIZ Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | 88.22% | 20.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIZ and RGTU have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RGTU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RGTU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for NBIZ.
RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 88.22%, compared with 0.00% for NBIZ.
NBIZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while RGTU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for NBIZ and 1.30% for RGTU.
Find the right allocation for NBIZ and RGTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer