PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIZ vs. FLYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIZ vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NBIZ

1D
24.45%
1M
-49.56%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLYD

1D
2.48%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
-10.89%
6M
-18.12%
1Y
-47.47%
3Y*
-54.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIZ vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NBIZ and FLYD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIZ vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIZ

FLYD
FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIZ vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NBIZ vs. FLYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBIZFLYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

-0.74

+0.29

Drawdowns

NBIZ vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIZ drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, roughly equal to the maximum FLYD drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIZ and FLYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBIZFLYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.84%

-98.11%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.16%

-97.94%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.74%

-83.15%

+13.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.34%

Volatility

NBIZ vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBIZFLYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

218.90%

74.52%

+144.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

218.90%

83.64%

+135.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

218.90%

83.64%

+135.26%

NBIZ vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLYD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBIZ vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBIZ nor FLYD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIZ and FLYD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLYD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLYD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for NBIZ.

NBIZ and FLYD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NBIZ tracks Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS), while FLYD tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for NBIZ and 0.95% for FLYD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIZ and FLYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer