NBIZ vs. ARCX
NBIZ (Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF) and ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBIZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS), while ARCX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. NBIZ is passively managed, while ARCX is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. NBIZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for ARCX.
Performance
NBIZ vs. ARCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBIZ
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -54.39%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARCX
- 1D
- -5.46%
- 1M
- -31.06%
- YTD
- -60.14%
- 6M
- -68.25%
- 1Y
- -84.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIZ vs. ARCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBIZ Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF | -97.09% |
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF | -67.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIZ and ARCX is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | -0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIZ vs. ARCX — Risk / Return Rank
NBIZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARCX
NBIZ vs. ARCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIZ | ARCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.90 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIZ vs. ARCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIZ drawdown since its inception was -98.35%, which is greater than ARCX's maximum drawdown of -91.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIZ and ARCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIZ | ARCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.35% | -91.99% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -91.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.31% | -90.94% | -7.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.75% | -65.37% | -6.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 69.52% | — |
Volatility
NBIZ vs. ARCX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIZ | ARCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 47.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 89.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 213.40% | 138.39% | +75.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 213.40% | 140.88% | +72.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 213.40% | 140.88% | +72.52% |
NBIZ vs. ARCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ARCX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIZ vs. ARCX - Dividend Comparison
Neither NBIZ nor ARCX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIZ and ARCX have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARCX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARCX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for NBIZ.
NBIZ and ARCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
NBIZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ARCX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for NBIZ and 1.30% for ARCX.
Find the right allocation for NBIZ and ARCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer