PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIL vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIL vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIL achieves a 462.18% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.


NBIL

1D
-7.17%
1M
83.16%
YTD
462.18%
6M
280.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MULL

1D
2.92%
1M
216.81%
YTD
936.86%
6M
1,369.93%
1Y
6,074.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIL vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NBIL
GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
462.18%-59.19%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
936.86%103.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIL and MULL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIL vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIL

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIL vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NBIL vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBILMULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

7.45

-6.15

Drawdowns

NBIL vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIL drawdown since its inception was -77.87%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIL and MULL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBILMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.87%

-72.29%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.98%

0.00%

-9.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.90%

-20.62%

-24.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.79%

Volatility

NBIL vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBILMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

55.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

105.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

199.38%

132.38%

+67.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

199.38%

136.22%

+63.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

199.38%

136.22%

+63.16%

NBIL vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NBIL and MULL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

NBIL vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

NBIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NBIL and MULL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NBIL and MULL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for NBIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIL and MULL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer